Gene‐gene Interaction of Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms in 16p13.3 May Contribute to the Risk of Non‐syndromic Cleft Lip with or Without Cleft Palate in Chinese Case‐parent Trios

Dongjing Liu,Hong Wang,Holger Schwender,Mary L. Marazita,Zhuqing Wang,Yuan,Ping Wang,Kung Yee Liang,Yah Huei Wu-Chou,Mengying Wang,Bing Shi,Hongping Zhu,Tao Wu,Terri H. Beaty
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.a.38190
2017-01-01
American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A
Abstract:Non‐syndromic cleft lip with or without cleft palate (NSCL/P) is a common birth defect with a complex and heterogeneous etiology. A recent genome‐wide association study (GWAS) among Chinese populations has identified a new region at 16p13.3 as being associated with NSCL/P, which requires further replication. Here, we attempted to replicate and further clarify the genetic association between this region and NSCL/P, as well as testing for potential gene‐gene (G × G) and gene‐environment (G × E) interactions. We conducted transmission disequilibrium tests on 69 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) mapping to 16p13.3 among 806 Chinese case‐parent trios ascertained through an international consortium where a GWAS of oral clefts was conducted. G × G, as well as G × E interactions involving maternal environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) and multivitamin supplementation, were explored using conditional logistic regression model. We applied Cordell's method as implemented in the R package TRIO to test for possible interactions. While no SNPs showed evidence of linkage and association with NSCL/P after Bonferroni correction, we found signals of G × G interactions between SNPs in 16p13.3. Nine pairs of SNP‐SNP interactions attained significance after Bonferroni correction, among which the most significant interaction was found between rs2072346 (ADCY9) and rs11646137 (intergenic region, P = 7.2 × 10−5). Linkage disequilibrium (LD) analysis revealed only low level of LD between these SNPs. This study failed to confirm the significant association between SNPs within 16p13.3 and the risk of NSCL/P, but underlined the importance of taking into account potential G × G interactions for the genetic association analysis of NSCL/P.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?