Abstract:OBJECTIVE:To develop and evaluate scaling and scoring assumptions, and the reliability and the validity of a Chinese version of the SF-36 scales.METHODS:A multi-stage mixed sampling procedure was used to select a representative sample of the general population. The sample size was 1 000 households. All family members of a selected household, aged 18 and older, completed a survey by self-administration. Formal psychometric methods for testing assumptions underlying item scoring and scale construction were used according to the standard procedure of the IQOLA Project.RESULTS:Of the 1 985 collected questionnaires, 1 972 were qualified. Of them, 1 688 (85.6%) were respondents. 1 316 respondents answered all 36 items, while the remaining (372 respondents) answered with one or several missing responses. Among the non-respondents, 65.5% were illiteracy or quasi-illiteracy. The assumption of equal intervals was violated for the VT and MH scales. The recoded item values were used to calculate scale scores. The clustering and ordering of the item means were approximately the same as that of the source version and other two Chinese versions. The items in each scale had similar standard deviations except those in the PF, BP, SF scales. The correlations between an item and its hypothesized scale were identical for all except the SF and VT scales. The scaling success rates of convergent validity were 0% for the SF scale, 75% for the VT scale, and 100% for the other six scales. The scaling success rates of discriminat validity ranged from 87.5% to 100% for all scales except for the SF scale. The Cronbach' alpha coefficients of internal consistency reliability ranged from 0.72 to 0.88, which were satisfactory for group comparison except 0.39 for the SF scale and 0.66 for the VT scale. The two-weeks test-retest reliability coefficient ranged from 0.66 to 0.94. Factor analysis identified two principal components: a "physical" factor and a "mental" factor. Taken together, these two factors could be used to explain 56.3% of the total variance.CONCLUSION:The Chinese version of the SF-36 Health Survey Scale has achieved conceptual equivalence and satisfied the psychometric scaling assumptions well enough to warrant wide use in China. Known-groups validity will give more meaningful evidences of the validity of the Chinese SF-36 scales.

Self-Care Ability Scale for the Elderly--Chinese Version

[Reliability and Validity of a Short-Form Health Survey Scale (SF-36), Chinese Version Used in an Elderly Population of Zhejiang Province in China].

The Development of the Social Health Scale for the Elderly.

Testing and comparing two self-care-related instruments among older Chinese adults

The Development and Validation of Chinese Health Literacy Scale (CHLS) for Older People

Reliability and validity of Chinese version of the Simplified Nutritional Appetite Questionnaire (SNAQ) in community-dwelling old people

Development and Psychometric Tests of a Chinese Version of the SF-36 Health Survey Scales.

Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the self-care scale for older adults undergoing hip fracture surgery: A translation and validation study

Translation of the Chinese version of the Self‐Care for Aspiration Pneumonia Prevention Scale and its validation among Chinese community dwelling elderly with risk of dysphasia

Measuring Self-Efficacy and Readiness for Advance Care Planning in Chinese Older Adults

Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the Elderly-Constipation Impact Scale: a translation and validation study

The Self-care Ability Scale for the Elderly

Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the caregiver contribution to self-care of chronic illness inventory in China: a cross-sectional study

Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the aging transformation scale for older adults with dementia

Psychometric Testing of the Chinese Version of the Coping and Adaptation Processing Scale-Short Form in Adults with Chronic Illness

Translation and validation of the Chinese version of Palliative Care Self-Efficacy Scale

Reliability and Validity of Chinese Version of the Short Form of Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire for Elderly Patients

Reliability and Validity of Chinese Version of Comprehensive Frailty Assessment Instrument

Preliminary Reliability and Validity Testing of a Self-Efficacy Questionnaire for Chinese Family Caregivers

Reliability and Vaiidatioa of the Social Comparison Orientation Scale

Revised Chinese resident health literacy scale for the older adults in China: simplified version and initial validity testing