Effects of the Donor Age on Proliferation, Senescence and Osteogenic Capacity of Human Urine-Derived Stem Cells

Peng Gao,Peilin Han,Dapeng Jiang,Shulong Yang,Qingbo Cui,Zhaozhu Li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10616-017-0084-5
IF: 2.2
2017-01-01
Cytotechnology
Abstract:To study the effects of the donor age on the application potential of human urine-derived stem cells (hUSCs) in bone tissue engineering, by comparing proliferation, senescence and osteogenic differentiation of hUSCs originated from volunteers with different ages. The urine samples were collected from 19 healthy volunteers (6 cases from children group aged from 5 to 14, 5 cases from middle-aged group aged from 30 to 40, and 8 cases from the elder group aged from 65 to 75), and hUSCs were isolated and cultured. The cell morphology was observed by microscope and the cell surface markers were identified by flow cytometry. Their abilities to undergo osteogenic, adipogenic and chondrogenic differentiation were determined in vitro, and cell proliferation analyses were performed using Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK8) Assay. The senescence of hUSCs among three groups was assessed by senescence-associated β galactosidase staining. After osteogenic differentiation, the alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity of hUSCs was measured and expression of osteogenic-related runt-related transcription factor 2 (RUNX2) and osteocalcin (OCN) was determined by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) and western blot. The hUSCs isolated from urine samples were adherent cells displayed "rice gain"-like and "spindle-shaped" morphology, expressing surface markers of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) (CD73, CD90, CD105) and the peripheral cell marker (CD146), but not hematopoietic stem cell markers (CD34, CD45) or the embryonic stem cell marker (OCT3/4). The obtained hUSCs could be induced into osteogenic, adipogenic or chondrogenic differentiation. The hUSCs from the children group showed higher proliferation and lower tendency to senescence than those from the middle-aged and elder groups. After osteogenic induction, the ALP activity and RUNX2 and OCN expression of hUSCs from the children group were higher than those from the elder group. While no significant differences were observed when comparing the middle-aged group with the children group or the elder group. Donor age could influence the potency of hUSCs on proliferation, senescence and capacity of osteogenic differentiation. hUSCs from children group have shown higher proliferation, lower tendency to senescence, and stronger osteogenic capacity, which means to be more suitable for basic research and have better clinical application. Furthermore, hUSCs from all groups suggest the application potential in bone tissue engineering as seed cells.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?