Abstract:Deep neural networks (DNNs) have been shown lack of robustness, as they are vulnerable to small perturbations on the inputs. This has led to safety concerns on applying DNNs to safety-critical domains. Several verification approaches based on constraint solving have been developed to automatically prove or disprove safety properties for DNNs. However, these approaches suffer from the scalability problem, i.e., only small DNNs can be handled. To deal with this, abstraction based approaches have been proposed, but are unfortunately facing the precision problem, i.e., the obtained bounds are often loose. In this paper, we focus on a variety of local robustness properties and a (δ,ε) -global robustness property of DNNs, and investigate novel strategies to combine the constraint solving and abstraction-based approaches to work with these properties: We propose a method to verify local robustness, which improves a recent proposal of analyzing DNNs through the classic abstract interpretation technique, by a novel symbolic propagation technique. Specifically, the values of neurons are represented symbolically and propagated from the input layer to the output layer, on top of the underlying abstract domains. It achieves significantly higher precision and thus can prove more properties. We propose a Lipschitz constant based verification framework. By utilising Lipschitz constants solved by semidefinite programming, we can prove global robustness of DNNs. We show how the Lipschitz constant can be tightened if it is restricted to small regions. A tightened Lipschitz constantcan be helpful in proving local robustness properties. Furthermore, a global Lipschitz constant can be used to accelerate batch local robustness verification, and thus support the verification of global robustness. We show how the proposed abstract interpretation and Lipschitz constant based approaches can benefit from each other to obtain more precise results. Moreover, they can be also exploited and combined to improve constraints based approach. We implement our methods in the tool PRODeep, and conduct detailed experimental results on several benchmarks

Boosting the Robustness Verification of DNN by Identifying the Achilles's Heel.

There is Limited Correlation Between Coverage and Robustness for Deep Neural Networks

Attack-Guided Efficient Robustness Verification of ReLU Neural Networks

An Empirical Study on Correlation between Coverage and Robustness for Deep Neural Networks

Accelerating Robustness Verification of Deep Neural Networks Guided by Target Labels

Improving Fault Tolerance for Reliable DNN Using Boundary-Aware Activation

Enhancing Robustness Verification for Deep Neural Networks Via Symbolic Propagation

Eager Falsification for Accelerating Robustness Verification of Deep Neural Networks

SoK: Certified Robustness for Deep Neural Networks

Efficient Robustness Verification of the Deep Neural Networks for Smart IoT Devices

Global Robustness Verification Networks

DeepDyve: Dynamic Verification for Deep Neural Networks

Harnessing Neuron Stability to Improve DNN Verification

Robustness Verification of Classification Deep Neural Networks Via Linear Programming.

Certifying Global Robustness for Deep Neural Networks

DeepRTest: A Vulnerability-Guided Robustness Testing and Enhancement Framework for Deep Neural Networks.

CLEVEREST: Accelerating CEGAR-based Neural Network Verification via Adversarial Attacks

Measuring Robustness of Deep Neural Networks from the Lens of Statistical Model Checking.

Improving Model Robustness Against Adversarial Examples with Redundant Fully Connected Layer.

VNN: Verification-Friendly Neural Networks with Hard Robustness Guarantees

Adversarial Robustness of Deep Neural Networks: A Survey from a Formal Verification Perspective