Abstract:Additive manufacturing (AM) enables flexible part geometry and functionality, and reduces product development life cycle by direct layer-wise fabrication from CAD files. In the last decade, great achievements are made on AM materials, machines, processes, etc. However, the quality of the AM parts is still questionable for industrial specifications. On the one hand, AM part quality variables can be either quantitative, such as dimensional accuracy, or qualitative, such as binary indicators for voids, missing features, or surface roughness. On the other hand, both offline process setting variables and functional in situ process variables can be measured and modeled with both quantitative and qualitative (QQ) quality response variables. In this paper, the QQ quality response variables are modeled by offline process setting variables and in situ process variables via functional QQ models. The modeling of these in situ process variables provides the basis for real-time monitoring and control for AM processes. Simulation studies and experimental data from a fused deposition modeling process are performed to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method. Note to Practitioners—Additive manufacturing (AM) processes have attracted much attention and showed many advantages over the traditional subtractive manufacturing processes. However, the product quality issues make AM intractable for high-quality parts in industrial applications. This paper aims to address the quality issues by modeling both quantitative quality variables, such as dimensional accuracy, and qualitative quality variables, such as the binary (go/no-go) indicator for surface conditions. Both offline process setting variables and in situ process variables are used in the model as predictors. Such a model is important for systematically quality evaluation of AM parts, and provides the basis for future process monitoring and control. The merits of the proposed method are demonstrated with simulation studies and a case study in a fused deposition modeling process.

3D Printing Process Selection Model Based on Triangular Intuitionistic Fuzzy Numbers in Cloud Manufacturing

Surface Accuracy Optimization of Mechanical Parts with Multiple Circular Holes for Additive Manufacturing Based on Triangular Fuzzy Number

Visualized Performance Evaluation of 3D CAD Software Based on the Characterization of Test Data by Cloud Model

Service Architecture And Evaluation Model Of Distributed 3d Printing Based On Cloud Manufacturing

Research on Manufacturing Resources Optimal Allocation Strategy of 3D Printing Cloud Service Platform

3D Printing in the Context of Cloud Manufacturing

A Slicing Optimization Method of Manifold Model for 3D Printing Based on Dual Inclinations Probability

A Hybrid Model of Requirement Acquisition Based on Consumer's Preferenceon for 3D Printing Cloud Service Platform

Customized Production Based on Distributed 3D Printing Services in Cloud Manufacturing

Multivariate process capability evaluation of cloud manufacturing resource based on intuitionistic fuzzy set

3D Printing Distributed Mold Intelligent Manufacturing Model Analysis

Functional Quantitative and Qualitative Models for Quality Modeling in a Fused Deposition Modeling Process.

Cloud-based 3D printing service allocation models for mass customization

Self-organizing Evaluation Model and Algorithm for Manufacturing Cloud Services Driven by User Behavior

Two-dimensional Optimization Mechanism and Method for On-Demand Supply of Manufacturing Cloud Service

Tolerance Design and Adjustment of Complex Customized Product Based on Cloud Manufacturing

Study on Resource Configuration on Cloud Manufacturing

Quantitative Analysis of Surface Profile in Fused Deposition Modelling

Qualify assessment for extrusion-based additive manufacturing with 3D scan and machine learning

Research on 3D printing service model for innovation, entrepreneurship, and universal applications

Research progress in the digitization of additive manufacturing model processing