Abstract:Due to the complexity of software systems, defects are inevitable. Understanding the types of defects could help developers to adopt measures in current and future software releases. In practice, developers often categorize defects into various types. One common categorization is based on fault triggers of defects. Fault trigger is a set of conditions which activate a defect (i.e., Fault) and propagate the defect into a failure. In general, there are two types of defect based fault triggering conditions, Bohrbug and Mandelbug. Bohrbug refers to a bug which can be easily isolated, and its activation and error propagation is simple. Mandelbug refers to a bug whose activation and/or error propagation is complex (e.g., A time lag between the fault activation and the failure occurrence). With these category labels, developers can better perform post-mortem analysis to identify common characteristic of the defects, and design specific fault-tolerance mechanisms. However, in most software systems, these category labels are often unavailable. To address this problem, in this paper, we propose a text mining solution which categorize defects into fault trigger categories by analyzing the natural-language description of bug reports. A previous study shows that Mandelbug is more complex and needs more time to be fixed. Thus, to better identify Mandelbugs, we propose a novel Fuzzy Set based Feature Selection algorithm named USES, which selects the features (i.e., Terms) which have high ability to distinguish Mandelbugs from Bohrbugs. USES first caches a set of terms based on their fuzzy affinity scores to Bohrbug or Mandelbug. Next, it iterates many times, and in each iteration, it selects a subset of terms, and builds a classifier on these terms. USES selects the classifier and the terms which could achieve the best performance on a training data. We evaluate our solution on 4 datasets including Linux, Mysql, Apache HTTPD, and AXIS containing a total of 809 bug reports. We show that USES with naive Bayes multinomial achieves the best performance, it achieves Mandelbug F-measure scores of 0.298 - 0.615. We also compare USES with other baseline approaches. The results show that USES on average improves Mandelbug F-measure scores of the best performing baseline by 12.3%.

Which Defect Should Be Fixed First? Semantic Prioritization of Static Analysis Report.

Unifying Defect Prediction, Categorization, and Repair by Multi-Task Deep Learning

Automatic Defect Categorization Based on Fault Triggering Conditions

An Approach to Merge Results of Multiple Static Analysis Tools (short Paper).

Enhancing Bug-Inducing Commit Identification: A Fine-Grained Semantic Analysis Approach

Just-In-Time Defect Identification and Localization: A Two-Phase Framework.

Predicting Defect Priority Based On Neural Networks

Defect-Oriented Test Case Prioritization

An Empirical Study of False Negatives and Positives of Static Code Analyzers From the Perspective of Historical Issues

A Hybrid Approach to Detecting Security Defects in Programs

Bug Report Priority Prediction Using Developer-Oriented Socio-Technical Features

Practical and accurate pinpointing of configuration errors using static analysis

Mitigating Access Control Vulnerabilities through Interactive Static Analysis.

Enhancing Defect Prediction with Static Defect Analysis.

Prioritization of Crowdsourced Testing Reports

Mitigating False Positive Static Analysis Warnings: Progress, Challenges, and Opportunities

Towards A Novel Approach for Defect Localization Based on Part-of-Speech and Invocation

Efficacy of static analysis tools for software defect detection on open-source projects

An Effective Defect Detection and Warning Prioritization Approach for Resource Leaks

Optimizing Prioritization of Crowdsourced Test Reports of Web Applications through Image-to-Text Conversion

Defect Identification, Categorization, and Repair: Better Together