Fast and multiplexed DNA-PAINT

Nina Vogt
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-024-02287-6
IF: 48
2024-05-15
Nature Methods
Abstract:So far, there has been a tradeoff between speed and multiplexing for DNA-PAINT. Increasing the speed of DNA-PAINT required the use of specific DNA sequences, which dramatically reduced the number of sequences that could be used and therefore limited multiplexing. FLASH-PAINT from Bewersdorf's lab and SUM-PAINT from Ralf Jungmann's lab at the Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry in Germany overcome this tradeoff with conceptually similar ideas. Bewersdorf and Florian Schueder in his lab came up with the idea that "we could add an adapter in between the fluorescently labeled imager probe and the docking strand." This adapter includes sequences for binding to the docking strand and for binding to the imager strand. "You are decoupling the choice of fluorescent probes from the multiplexing capability," says Bewersdorf. While similar in principle, FLASH-PAINT and SUM-PAINT differ in the details, which affect the removal of the probes during multiplexing. In FLASH-PAINT, the adapter binds only transiently to the docking strand and an optional eraser, complementary in sequence to the adapter, neutralizing the adapter after use. In SUM-PAINT, the adapter includes a toehold, which then allows removal of the adapter via toehold-mediated strand replacement.
biochemical research methods
What problem does this paper attempt to address?