Abstract:Due to swift shifts in market demand and variable production capacities within the chip industry, trust risks between upstream and downstream entities can readily develop, leading to challenges in information sharing. To tackle this challenge, this paper develops a two‐level evolutionary game model between vehicle manufacturers and chip suppliers. It examines the effects of government rewards and penalties, trust risks, and spillover benefits from information sharing on the strategic decisions of both parties. Furthermore, the paper investigates system evolution strategies under three distinct government policies: forced, fair, and favored. The findings show that as trust risks escalate, both entities in the supply chain tend to withhold information due to concerns over losing their unique competitive advantages. However, enhancing spillover benefits through information sharing positively impacts the mitigation of trust risks. Numerical simulations demonstrate that while a government‐forced policy with increased penalties may boost information sharing in the short term, it proves less effective over the long term. Conversely, preferred rewards and subsidies under equitable policies can significantly boost one party's readiness to share information, thus enhancing cooperation between the two parties. The paper also offers countermeasures and recommendations. For instance, it suggests that upstream and downstream enterprises should not only foster mutual trust but also vigilantly track government policy directions to develop effective information‐sharing strategies. Furthermore, government industrial policies should fully consider the actual market conditions to alleviate trust risks between upstream and downstream entities and promote information sharing among enterprises.

Strategic interactions and market dynamics in the intelligent connected vehicle industry: An analysis of technology sharing, value co‐creation, and market competition

Open or Closed? Technology Sharing, Supplier Investment, and Competition

Strategic Alliance with Competitors in the Electric Vehicle Market: Tesla Motor’s Case

Analysis of the Business Models of the Intelligent and Connected Vehicle Industry

Research on Co-opetition Strategy of New Energy Vehicle Companies Based on Stackelberg Game: Taking Tesla and BYD as Examples

Intelligent Connected Vehicles: the Industrial Practices and Impacts on Automotive Value-Chains in China

The influence of key components and digital technologies on manufacturer's choice of innovation strategy

Collusion or Competition? Interfirm Relationships in the Chinese Auto Industry

Modeling Supply Chain Interaction and Disruption: Insights from Real-world Data and Complex Adaptive System

A Game-Theoretic Analytical Approach for Fostering Energy-Saving Innovation in the Electric Vehicle Supply Chain

How to Promote Traditional Automobile Companies’ Intelligent-Connected Transformation under the New Dual-Credit Policy? A Tripartite Evolutionary Game Analysis Combined with Funding Time Delay

The role of governmental policy in game between traditional fuel and new energy vehicles

A Novel Business Model for Electric Car Sharing.

Cooperation Modes between Competing Manufacturers in EV Supply Chain with Innovation-Driven Common Supplier

Cooperative Vehicle Infrastructure System or Autonomous Driving System? From the Perspective of Evolutionary Game Theory

Technology acquisition strategy in the context of the Internet of Things using game theory

Strategic Analysis on Establishing an Automobile Power in China Based on Intelligent & Connected Vehicles

Information‐Sharing Strategies Based on Trust Risks Under a Governmental Incentive Mechanism

Development Strategies of Intelligent Automotive Industry under the Background of Increasing Demand for Computational Capacity

Revolutionizing The Automotive Industry: Tesla's Innovative Marketing Strategies in The Face of Changes

Differential Game Analysis for Cooperation Models in Automotive Supply Chain under Low-Carbon Emission Reduction Policies