Clinical outcomes and survival rate analysis of 167 lung cancer patients with spinal metastasis receiving various local treatments

wen xiaoting,lu yaohong,wang zhiyu,zhang rui,yao yang,zhao hui
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3781/j.issn.1000-7431.2015.33.654
2015-01-01
Abstract:Objective: To explore the clinical outcomes and survival of lung cancer patients with spinal metastasis receiving local treatments including surgery ± radiation, percutaneous vertebroplasty(PVP) ± radiation and radiation alone.Methods: The clinical outcomes of 167 lung cancer patients with spinal metastasis receiving different local treatments were retrospectively analyzed. All the patients were divided into surgery ± radiation group, PVP ± radiation group and radiation alone group which contained 42, 70 and 55 patients, respectively. Before treatment and 24 h, 1 month and 3 months after treatment, the improvement of quality of life was assessed by Eastern Cooperation Oncology Group(ECOG) performance status(PS) score, the relief of pain was assessed by visual analogue scale/score(VAS), and rehabilitation in spinal cord injury was evaluated by Frankel classification. Follow-up was conducted, and the survival time was compared among three groups.Results: The median follow-up time was 24 months. One month after treatment, the improvement of ECOG PS score in PVP± radiation group was superior to surgery ± radiation group(P < 0.05). The VAS values in the three groups were all significantly improved after treatment(all P < 0.05). The two combined radiotherapy groups were superior to radiation alone group in pain relief(both P < 0.05). Three months after treatment, the rehabilitation of spinal cord injury in surgery ± radiation group was superior to PVP ± radiation group(P < 0.05). The median survival time in surgery ± radiation, PVP ± radiation and radiation alone groups were 17, 14 and 17 months, respectively. The difference in survival among the three groups was not statistically significant(P > 0.05).Conclusion: Various local treatments have different advantages for lung cancer patients with spinal metastasis. Surgical operation can effectively rehabilitate the spinal cord injury and improve the function of nerves, while PVP can relieve the pain more quickly and improve the quality of life in short time. Indications should be strictly grasped to make appropriate treatment protocols, then to improve the clinical efficacy as much as possible. However, these three local treatments have no direct relations to the survival.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?