Abstract:VISUMAX 800 was introduced to improve the patient experience and clinical outcomes of small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE). This was a retrospective, matched, and case–control study (1:2) controlled for preoperative central corneal thickness and refractive error that compared early refractive and visual outcomes after SMILE using VISUMAX 800 and VISUMAX 500 to treat myopia. We included 50 eyes that underwent the VISUMAX 800 SMILE and 100 eyes that underwent the VISUMAX 500 SMILE. SMILE using VISUMAX 800 was performed using the CentraLign aid for vertex centration. Cyclotorsion was controlled by an OcuLign assistant in the VISUMAX 800 group after corneal marking. Corneal higher-order aberrations (HOAs) were evaluated using a Pentacam 1 month after surgery. No differences were observed in the pre- and post-operative refractive and visual outcomes at 1 day, 1 month, and 6 months after surgery. VISUMAX 800 induced less total HOAs than VISUMAX 500 ( P = 0.036). No statistically significant differences were observed in the amounts of induced spherical aberrations or vertical and horizontal comas. No differences were observed in the 1 month and 6 months refractive and visual outcomes between two SMILE procedures, except for VISUMAX 800, which resulted in lower postoperative total HOAs than VISUMAX 500.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is: to compare the early visual and refractive results after small - incision refractive lenticule extraction (SMILE) for myopia treatment using VISUMAX 800 and VISUMAX 500, especially the changes in postoperative corneal higher - order aberrations (HOAs). ### Background - **SMILE Surgery**: It is a method of using femtosecond laser to create a lens within the cornea and remove it through a small incision to correct refractive errors. - **VISUMAX 500**: It is an early device used for SMILE surgery, but it has some operational deficiencies, such as manual alignment of the patient's corneal apex and center, which is likely to cause higher - order aberrations and affect visual quality. - **VISUMAX 800**: It is a new - generation SMILE surgery device, introducing CentraLign (for apex alignment) and OcuLign (for controlling rotation) auxiliary functions, aiming to improve surgical precision and patient experience. ### Research Objectives - **Compare Early Visual and Refractive Results**: Evaluate the visual and refractive results 1 day, 1 month, and 6 months after SMILE surgery using VISUMAX 800 and VISUMAX 500. - **Evaluate Corneal Higher - Order Aberrations**: Pay special attention to the changes in postoperative corneal higher - order aberrations (HOAs), including total higher - order aberrations, spherical aberration, and vertical and horizontal coma. ### Main Findings - **Visual and Refractive Results**: In terms of visual and refractive results 1 day, 1 month, and 6 months after surgery, there are no significant differences between VISUMAX 800 and VISUMAX 500. - **Corneal Higher - Order Aberrations**: One month after surgery, the total higher - order aberrations in the VISUMAX 800 group are significantly lower than those in the VISUMAX 500 group (P = 0.037). However, there are no significant differences between the two groups in the individual changes of spherical aberration and vertical and horizontal coma. ### Conclusions - **Advantages of VISUMAX 800**: Although there are no significant differences in visual and refractive results, VISUMAX 800 performs better in reducing postoperative total higher - order aberrations, which may be attributed to its more accurate alignment functions (CentraLign and OcuLign). - **Clinical Significance**: These results indicate that VISUMAX 800 has potential advantages in improving surgical precision and visual quality, especially in reducing higher - order aberrations. ### Formula Example - **Root Mean Square Value of Higher - Order Aberrations**: \[ \text{RMS}=\sqrt{\frac{1}{N}\sum_{i = 1}^{N}(a_i-\bar{a})^2} \] where \(a_i\) is each aberration coefficient, \(\bar{a}\) is the average aberration coefficient, and \(N\) is the number of aberration coefficients. Hope this information is helpful for you to understand this paper! If you have more questions or need further explanations, please feel free to ask.

Comparison of early visual outcomes after SMILE using VISUMAX 800 and VISUMAX 500 for myopia: a retrospective matched case–control study

Short-term Evaluation of Visual Quality, Amplitude of Accommodation, and Stereoacuity Between Patients with Moderate-to-High Myopia Who Underwent ICLV4c Implantation and SMILE.

Comparison of visual results and higher-order aberrations after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE): high myopia vs. mild to moderate myopia

Early Visual Outcomes and Optical Quality after Femtosecond Laser Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction for Myopia and Myopic Astigmatism Correction of Over-10 Dioptres

Comparison of Postoperative Safety, Efficacy, and Visual Quality after SMILE for Myopic Patients with Different Corneal Thicknesses

Comparison of Early Visual Quality in Patients with Moderate Myopia Using Different Optical Zones in Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE)

The comparison of visual outcomes, aberrations, and Bowman’s layer micro-distortions after femtosecond laser small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) for the correction of high and moderate myopia and myopic astigmatism

Comparison of Corneal Higher-Order Aberrations Following Topography-Guided LASIK and SMILE for Myopic Correction: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis

Comparison of Efficacy and Visual Outcomes after SMILE and FS-LASIK for the Correction of High Myopia with the Sum of Myopia and Astigmatism from -10.00 to -14.00 Dioptres.

Comparison of Visual Quality after EVO-ICL Implantation and SMILE to Select the Appropriate Surgical Method for High Myopia

Visual Quality after Smile and Lasek for Mild to Moderate Myopia

Comparison of the Visual Results after SMILE and Femtosecond Laser-Assisted LASIK for Myopia.

Comparison of Postoperative Visual Quality after SMILE and LASEK for High Myopia: A 1-Year Outcome.

Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) for Moderate and High Myopia: Seven-Year Outcomes of Refraction, Corneal Tomography, and Wavefront Aberrations

Early visual function outcomes of topography-guided FS-LASIK and SMILE in treatment of myopia and myopic astigmatism

Visual Outcomes after Small Incision Lenticule Extraction and Femtosecond Laser-Assisted LASIK for High Myopia.

Comparison of visual quality of SMILE surgery and wavefront-guided LASIK surgery in treating myopia

Visual Outcomes and Optical Quality After Femtosecond Laser Small Incision Lenticule Extraction: An 18-Month Prospective Study.

Comparison Of Objective And Subjective Visual Quality Early After Implantable Collamer Lens V4c (Icl V4c) And Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (Smile) For High Myopia Correction

Five-Year Follow-Up of Visual Outcomes and Optical Quality after Small Incision Lenticule Extraction for Moderate and High Myopia

An Analysis of Visual Quality after SMILE Surgery