Abstract:Whether and how people regulate their negative emotions matters a great deal. However, it is not yet clear why people regulate as they do. One promising idea is that people's beliefs shape their emotion regulation choices, and initial evidence indicates that individuals' dispositional beliefs about emotions are indeed associated with general patterns of emotion regulation. The present study extends prior work on emotion beliefs to better understand how occurrent (i.e., momentary) beliefs about helpfulness, controllability, and justification of specific emotions shape whether and how people regulate negative emotions in everyday life. Participants (N = 143; U.S. community college students recruited in 2022; 76% female; age = 18-60) completed a 7-day experience-sampling protocol in which they were pinged three times per day to describe their most recent negative experiences and answer questions about their emotions, occurrent beliefs about emotions, and emotion regulation. With respect to whether people regulate their emotions, results reveal that people regulate their emotions more when they perceive them to be less helpful. Exploratory analyses additionally show that people regulate negative emotions more when they perceive them to be more controllable and when emotional intensity is relatively high. In terms of how people regulate their emotions, people are more likely to use reappraisal when emotions are seen as more helpful, more controllable, and less justified; and more likely to use distraction when emotions are seen as less helpful and more justified. These findings contribute to a more fine-grained understanding of how beliefs shape emotion regulation in everyday life.respect to whether people regulate their emotions, results reveal that people regulate their emotions more when they perceive them to be less helpful. Exploratory analyses additionally show that people regulate negative emotions more when they perceive them to be more controllable and when emotional intensity is relatively high. In terms of how people regulate their emotions, people are more likely to use reappraisal when emotions are seen as more helpful, more controllable, and less justified; and more likely to use distraction when emotions are seen as less helpful and more justified. These findings contribute to a more fine-grained understanding of how beliefs shape emotion regulation (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

Beliefs about emotion usefulness are nuanced: degree of personal reference and emotional valence predict affective distress

Assessing beliefs about emotions: Development and validation of the Emotion Beliefs Questionnaire

Emotion malleability beliefs matter in emotion regulation: a comprehensive review and meta-analysis

Control and acceptance beliefs about emotions: associations with psychological distress and the mediating role of emotion regulation flexibility

The role of emotion beliefs in depression, anxiety, and stress

Occurrent beliefs about emotions predict emotion regulation in everyday life.

Believe, express, and enjoy: utility beliefs about social emotion expression consistently predict satisfactory outcomes

The Emotion Beliefs Questionnaire: Psychometric properties, norms, and links to affective outcomes

Contextual variation in beliefs about emotion and associated emotion regulation efforts

How I think about how I feel: Personal beliefs about emotion prospectively predict suicide-related outcomes and depression symptoms

Emotion beliefs: conceptual review and compendium

Emotion malleability beliefs and event intensity and importance predict emotion regulation in daily life

Dimensions of Emotion Regulation as Mediators of the Relationship Between Emotion Controllability Beliefs With Stress and Well-Being

Emotion regulation efficacy beliefs: The outsized impact of base rates.

Exploring two models of emotion regulation: how strategy use, abilities, and flexibility relate to well-being and mental illness

Loneliness Versus Distress: A Comparison of Emotion Regulation Profiles

Development and Validation of the Affect Intolerance Scale to Assess Maladaptive Beliefs and Avoidance of Emotion

Naïve theories of emotions: Why people might (not) be uncertain or in conflict about felt emotions

Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: Implications for affect, relationships, and well-being.

Be aware, make it clear, and take the Lead: emotion regulation difficulties and emotional intelligence as moderators of cognitive reappraisal

Distinct aspects of emotion dysregulation differentially correspond to magnitude and slope of the late positive potential to affective stimuli