MeerKAT observations of Herschel protocluster candidates

Y Ding,D L Clements,L L Leeuw,I Heywood,H Dannerbauer,A Parmar,P Legodi,R J Ivison,R Blake,C M Gutiérrez,A Carnero,W Sutherland
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stae2356
IF: 4.8
2024-11-04
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Abstract:High-redshift protoclusters consisting of dusty starbursts are thought to play an important role in galaxy evolution. Their dusty nature makes them bright in the far-infrared (FIR)/submm but difficult to find in optical/near-infrared (NIR) surveys. Radio observations are an excellent way to study these dusty starbursts, as dust is transparent in the radio and there is a tight correlation between the FIR and radio emission of a galaxy. Here, we present MeerKAT 1.28 GHz radio imaging of three Herschel candidate protoclusters, with a synthesized beam size of arcsec and a central thermal noise down to Jy beam −1 . Our source counts are consistent with other radio counts with no evidence of overdensities. Around 95 per cent of the Herschel sources have 1.28 GHz IDs. Using the Herschel m primary beam size as the searching radius, we find 54.2 per cent Herschel sources have multiple 1.28 GHz IDs. Our average FIR-radio correlation coefficient is . Adding as a new constraint, the probability of finding chance-aligned sources is reduced by a factor of , but with the risk of discarding true identifications of radio-loud/quiet sources. With accurate MeerKAT positions, we cross-match our Herschel sources to optical/NIR data followed by photometric redshift estimations. By removing sources, the density contrasts of two of the candidate protoclusters increase, suggestive of them being real protoclusters at . There is also potentially a overdensity associated with one candidate protocluster. In summary, photometric redshifts from radio-optical cross-identifications have provided some tentative evidence of overdensities aligning with two of the candidate protoclusters.
astronomy & astrophysics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?