Abstract:Computer vision technologies have been applied to an increasingly wide range of applications from autonomous car navigation, to medical image analysis, to precision agriculture. Despite many of these exciting innovations, recent studies reveal a number of risks in using existing computer vision systems, suggesting results of such systems may be unfair or untrustworthy. For example, major commercial facial analysis tools were shown to have substantial accuracy disparities for people of different gender or with different skin colors (Buolamwini and Gebru 2018). Visual semantic role labeling models were found to exhibit societal biases and stereotypes (Zhao et al. 2017) such as frequently associating certain activity labels with specific gender (e.g., associate “cooking” with woman). Even worse, seemly accurate image classifiers may in fact made the predictions by picking up spurious correlations between objects and irrelevant background information rather than identifying meaningful features of the objects (Ribeiro, Singh, and Guestrin 2016). Many of the risks embedded in modern computer vision systems can be attributed to the use of a training dataset that is biased. Indeed, the computer vision community has long recognized that many visual datasets present varying degrees of build-in bias due to factors such as photographic style of photographers and selection from dataset curators (Torralba, Efros, and others 2011). Using these biased datasets to train machine learning models for addressing different computer vision tasks naturally leads to the phenomenon of “bias in, bias out” and results in undesirable performance. Thus, to mitigate the fairness, accountability, and transparency concerns in computer vision, a crucial step is to start the entire pipeline with high-quality visual datasets that, at least, are authentic representations of the visual world. In other words, being able to detect potential biases hidden in the datasets prior to model development is a key step in guarding against unfair or untrustworthy outcomes in computer vision. While a few techniques have been developed to automatically detect dataset biases (Tramer et al. 2017), the nonstructured nature of visual data makes bias discovery in image datasets particularly challenging. This is because no human-comprehensive attributes can be directly leveraged

Countering Racial Bias in Computer Graphics Research

Discovering Biases in Image Datasets with the Crowd

Crowdsourcing Detection of Sampling Biases in Image Datasets

Sex and Gender in the Computer Graphics Research Literature

Algorithmic Fairness and Color-blind Racism: Navigating the Intersection

Racial Bias in Clinical and Population Health Algorithms: A Critical Review of Current Debates

No computation without representation: Avoiding data and algorithm biases through diversity

Skin Deep: Investigating Subjectivity in Skin Tone Annotations for Computer Vision Benchmark Datasets

Fairness and Bias Mitigation in Computer Vision: A Survey

One Label, One Billion Faces: Usage and Consistency of Racial Categories in Computer Vision

De-Biasing the Bias: Methods for Improving Disparity Assessments with Noisy Group Measurements

Surveying Racial Bias in Facial Recognition: Balancing Datasets and Algorithmic Enhancements

Rethinking Common Assumptions to Mitigate Racial Bias in Face Recognition Datasets

Gender Slopes: Counterfactual Fairness for Computer Vision Models by Attribute Manipulation

Racial Bias within Face Recognition: A Survey

Bias and Fairness in Computer Vision Applications of the Criminal Justice System

Lookism: The overlooked bias in computer vision

Comparing Human and Machine Bias in Face Recognition

A Novel Method for Analysing Racial Bias: Collection of Person Level References

The Perspective of Software Professionals on Algorithmic Racism

Towards causal benchmarking of bias in face analysis algorithms