Abstract:Background: Assessing the umbilical artery pulsatility index via Doppler measurements plays a crucial role in evaluating fetal growth impairment. Objective: This study aimed to investigate perinatal outcomes associated with discordant pulsatility indices of umbilical arteries in fetuses with growth restriction. Study design: In this retrospective cohort study, all singleton pregnancies were included if their estimated fetal weight and/or abdominal circumference fell below the 10th percentile for gestational age (2017-2022). Eligible cases included singleton pregnancies with concurrent sampling of both umbilical arteries within 14 days of birth at the ultrasound evaluation closest to delivery. The exclusion criteria included births before 22 weeks of gestation, evidence of absent or reverse end-diastolic flow in either umbilical artery, and known fetal genetic or structural anomalies. The study compared cases with discordant umbilical artery pulsatility index values (defined as 1 umbilical artery pulsatility index at ≤95th percentile and the other umbilical artery pulsatility index at >95th percentile for gestational age) to pregnancies where both umbilical artery pulsatility indices had normal pulsatility index values and those with both umbilical arteries displaying abnormal pulsatility index values. The primary outcome assessed was the occurrence of composite adverse neonatal outcomes. Multivariable logistic regressions were performed, adjusting for relevant covariates. Results: The study encompassed 1014 patients, including 194 patients (19.1%) with discordant umbilical artery pulsatility index values among those who had both umbilical arteries sampled close to delivery, 671 patients (66.2%) with both umbilical arteries having normal pulsatility index values, and 149 patients (14.7%) with both umbilical arteries exhibiting abnormal values. Pregnancies with discordant umbilical artery pulsatility index values displayed compromised sonographic parameters compared with those with both umbilical arteries showing normal pulsatility index values. Similarly, the number of abnormal umbilical artery pulsatility index values was associated with adverse perinatal outcomes in a dose-response manner. Cases with 1 abnormal (discordant) umbilical artery pulsatility index value showed favorable sonographic parameters and perinatal outcomes compared with cases with both abnormal umbilical artery pulsatility index values, and cases with both abnormal umbilical artery pulsatility index values showed worse sonographic parameters and perinatal outcomes compared with cases with discordant UA PI values. Multivariate analysis revealed that discordant umbilical artery pulsatility indices were significantly and independently associated with composite adverse perinatal outcomes, with an adjusted odds ratio of 1.75 (95% confidence interval, 1.24-2.47; P = .002). Conclusion: Evaluating the resistance indices of both umbilical arteries may provide useful data and assist in assessing adverse perinatal outcomes among fetuses with growth restriction.

Hepatic arterial buffer response in monochorionic twins with selective fetal growth restriction

Cerebroplacental blood flow redistribution in monochorionic‐diamniotic twin pregnancies with selective fetal growth restriction

Maternal Utero-Placental Perfusion Discordance in Monochorionic-Diamniotic Twin Pregnancies with Selective Growth Restriction Assessed by Three-Dimensional Power Doppler Ultrasound

Hepatic arterial buffer response: activation in donor fetuses and the effect of laser ablation of intertwin anastomosis

Fetal Growth Restriction: Does an Integrated Maternal Hemodynamic-Placental Model Fit Better?

OP12.04: Umbilical vein blood flow in monochorionic twin pregnancies affected by selective fetal growth restriction

Predictors of Poor Outcomes in Monochorionic Diamniotic Twin Pregnancies Complicated by Selective Fetal Growth Restriction

Perinatal Outcomes in Appropriately Grown Monochorionic Diamniotic Twins With Intermittent Absent and Reversed End‐Diastolic Umbilical Artery Flow Compared to Selective Fetal Growth Restriction Type III

Prediction of adverse pregnancy outcome in monochorionic diamniotic twin pregnancy complicated by selective fetal growth restriction

Validation of ultrasound Doppler characteristics at different periods as predictive tools for selective fetal growth restriction in monochorionic diamniotic twin pregnancy

The changing Doppler patterns and perinatal outcomes of monochorionic diamniotic twins with selective fetal growth restriction

A Study on the Correlation of Placental Anastomosis and Superficial Vascular Branches of Selective Fetal Growth Restriction in Monochorionic Diamniotic Twins.

Placental Characteristics of Monochorionic Twin Pregnancy Complicated with Selective Fetal Growth Restriction

The clinical meaning of the S/D ratio of umbilical artery in forecasting fetal growth of twins

The association between discordant umbilical arterial resistance in growth-restricted fetuses and adverse outcomes

Maternal vascular indices at 36 weeks' gestation in small and growth restricted fetuses

Relationship between arterial and venous Doppler and perinatal outcome in fetal growth restriction

Thick artery-artery anastomoses delay the onset of selective fetal growth restriction in monochorionic diamniotic twins: a 7-year single-center cohort study

Artery-to-vein anastomoses in unequally divided placentas and their association with birthweight discordance

Metabolic Biomarkers of Monochorionic Twins Complicated with Selective Intrauterine Growth Restriction in Cord Plasma and Placental Tissue

Predicting Adverse Outcomes in Monochorionic-Diamniotic Twins: The Role of Intertwin Discrepancy in Middle Cerebral Artery Doppler Measurements and the Cerebroplacental Ratio