Why, Instead of Doing Nothing, do we Work? A Cultural-Psychological Essay on the Foundations of the Purpose of Working

Pedro F. Bendassolli

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-024-09832-0

IF: 1.156

2024-03-22

Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science

Abstract:This essay aims to discuss the meaning and purpose of work by adopting an approach in cultural psychology that emphasizes the centrality of the meaning-making process. The central thesis of the paper is to demonstrate that the meaning and purpose of work is a paradox. On the one hand, work represents a set of actions of the human agent for producing things. That is to say, the purpose of work is located outside of it. On the other hand, work is an activity in itself, carried out as a way of developing human potentialities. In this case, the purpose of the actions performed at work coincides with the result of working (developing human potentialities). The paradox arises because, in current work conditions, the unity of human agency represented by these two dimensions of work is fragmented, meaning that not all forms of work permit the convergence among purposes, actions, and the results of these actions. We analyze how some cultural markers, which are products of the process of meaning-making of the human agent in culture, suggest dealing with this paradox. We explore its limits and propose the need for new cultural markers capable of reaffirming the integrality of the human agent at work.

psychology, biological

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is the paradox regarding the meaning and purpose of work. Specifically, the author explores the dual nature of work:

1. **External purpose**: Work is regarded as a series of actions aimed at producing a certain product or result. In this case, the purpose of work lies outside it, that is, in the outcome produced through work.
2. **Internal value**: Work itself is also an activity aimed at developing human potential. In this case, the purpose of work is consistent with its result, that is, achieving personal development through work.

However, under current working conditions, the unity between these two dimensions has been severed. Many forms of work do not allow for consistency among purpose, action, and result, leading to the paradox of the meaning and purpose of work. The author analyzes this paradox and explores how some cultural markers can help deal with it, while also proposing the need for new cultural markers to restore the wholeness of people in work.

### Core issues of the paper
- **Paradox of the meaning of work**: How to understand that work is both a productive activity and a process of self - development?
- **Role of cultural markers**: The limitations of existing cultural markers in dealing with this paradox, and the need to create new cultural markers to reaffirm the wholeness of people in work.

### Key concepts
- **Human agency**: The two basic and interdependent dimensions of human behavior: one is the action taken for external purposes, and the other is the activity as an end in itself.
- **Cultural markers**: Symbols and interpretations in culture that give meaning to work and help people understand and deal with the paradox in work.
- **Wholeness**: Restoring the wholeness of people in work so that purpose, action, and result can be consistent.

Through these analyses, the author hopes to reveal the problems under current working conditions and propose solutions to restore the harmony between the internal value and external purpose of work.