British Society for Cutaneous AllergyOral presentationsCD01 Isobornyl acrylate in nail cosmetics
Fangyi Xie,Jane Sansom,Aparna Sinha
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bjd/ljae090.180
IF: 11.113
2024-06-28
British Journal of Dermatology
Abstract:Abstract We present two cases of patients with allergic contact dermatitis to acrylates from gel nail kits, containing isobornyl (meth)acrylate (IBA). IBA has been associated with contact allergic dermatitis from medical devices, namely insulin pumps and continuous glucose-monitoring devices. However, it has not previously been reported with nail cosmetics. We examined commercially available nail cosmetics to look for the presence of IBA. We compiled the ingredients of the top 10 search results from four online sources (Amazon, Boots, Look Fantastic, Nail Polish Direct) for ‘gel nails’. We looked for ingredients in the initial website, the official product website and the safety data sheet, or emailed the company where the information was not available. One patient was a 23-year-old woman who was a keen recreational acrylic, gel and press-on nail user, with a 6-year history of a blistering rash in the periungual region and fissuring of the finger pulps. She had positive patch test reactions to multiple acrylates: 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA), 1,4-butanediol dimethacrylate, 1,6-hexanediol diacrylate, triethylene glycol diacrylate, diethylene glycol diacrylate, ethyl methacrylate, ethyl acrylate, methyl methacrylate, 2-hydroxyethyl acrylate and IBA. The second patient was a 45-year-old woman with chronic atopic dermatitis who had recently developed a facial flare after using gel nails. She had positive patch test reactions to diethylene glycol diacrylate, methylisothiazolinone and methylchloroisothiazolinone. Both patients used commercial gel nails containing IBA. Thirty-two of 40 (80%) products were gel nail polishes, and the rest were two each (5%) of gel-like polish, gel nail tips, stick-on gel nails and topcoat. Twenty of 40 (50%) products had no ingredients listed on the commercial website, of which six (30%) had no further information on the official product website or on the initial websites. All products contained at least one acrylate. IBA was in eight of 34 (24%) products, of which four were in the isobornyl methacrylate form. The most common acrylates were acrylate copolymers (17 of 34, 50%), HEMA (13 of 34, 38%), 2-hydroxypropyl acrylate (10 of 34, 29%), di-HEMA trimethylhexyl dicarbamate (6 of 34, 18%), hydroxyethyl acrylate (6 of 34, 18%) and trimethylolpropane triacrylate (5 of 34, 15%). The incidence of acrylate allergic contact dermatitis has risen due to the increasing popularity of salon and nonoccupational use with home ultraviolet light devices to cure monomers. Limitations of the study include only online searches, which may miss common products in salons or stores. We wanted to highlight the presence of IBA in commercially available nail cosmetics, given the recognized cross reactions and cosensitizing potential of acrylates.
dermatology