Symptomatic vs. non-symptomatic device-related thrombus after LAAC: a sub-analysis from the multicenter EUROC-DRT registry
Vivian Vij,Ignacio Cruz-González,Roberto Galea,Kerstin Piayda,Dominik Nelles,Lara Vogt,Steffen Gloekler,Monika Fürholz,Bernhard Meier,Lorenz Räber,Gilles O'Hara,Dabit Arzamendi,Victor Agudelo,Lluis Asmarats,Xavier Freixa,Eduardo Flores-Umanzor,Ole De Backer,Lars Sondergaard,Luis Nombela-Franco,Angela McInerney,Pablo Salinas,Kasper Korsholm,Jens Erik Nielsen-Kudsk,Shazia Afzal,Tobias Zeus,Felix Operhalski,Boris Schmidt,Gilles Montalescot,Paul Guedeney,Xavier Iriart,Noelie Miton,Jacqueline Saw,Thomas Gilhofer,Laurent Fauchier,Egzon Veliqi,Felix Meincke,Nils Petri,Peter Nordbeck,Rocio Gonzalez-Ferreiro,Deepak L Bhatt,Alessandra Laricchia,Antonio Mangieri,Heyder Omran,Jan Wilko Schrickel,Josep Rodes-Cabau,Georg Nickenig,Horst Sievert,Alexander Sedaghat
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-023-02237-w
Abstract:Background: Device-related thrombus (DRT) after left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) is associated with adverse outcomes, i.e. ischemic stroke or systemic embolism (SE). Data on predictors of stroke/SE in the context of DRT are limited. Aims: This study aimed to identify predisposing factors for stroke/SE in DRT patients. In addition, the temporal connection of stroke/SE to DRT diagnosis was analyzed. Methods: The EUROC-DRT registry included 176 patients, in whom DRT after LAAC were diagnosed. Patients with symptomatic DRT, defined as stroke/SE in the context of DRT diagnosis, were compared against patients with non-symptomatic DRT. Baseline characteristics, anti-thrombotic regimens, device position, and timing of stroke/SE were compared. Results: Stroke/SE occurred in 25/176 (14.2%) patients diagnosed with DRT (symptomatic DRT). Stroke/SE occurred after a median of 198 days (IQR 37-558) after LAAC. In 45.8% stroke/SE occurred within one month before/after DRT diagnosis (DRT-related stroke). Patients with symptomatic DRT had lower left ventricular ejection fractions (50.0 ± 9.1% vs. 54.2 ± 11.0%, p = 0.03) and higher rates of non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (84.0% vs. 64.9%, p = 0.06). Other baseline parameters and device positions were not different. Most ischemic events occurred among patients with single antiplatelet therapy (50%), however, stroke/SE was also observed under dual antiplatelet therapy (25%) or oral anticoagulation (20%). Conclusion: Stroke/SE are documented in 14.2% and occur both in close temporal relation to the DRT finding and chronologically independently therefrom. Identification of risk factors remains cumbersome, putting all DRT patients at substantial risk for stroke/SE. Further studies are necessary to minimize the risk of DRT and ischemic events.