Abstract:Optical remote sensing techniques can indicate the properties of objects by observing different modalities (physical quantities) of the backscattered light at different optical wavelengths. Established examples are reflectance, fluorescence, Raman, or depolarization spectroscopy. LiDAR sensing, on the other hand, allows acquiring the geometry of objects by measuring the propagation delay of optical probing signals. Multimodal multispectral (MM) LiDAR combines these capabilities and extends conventional monochromatic LiDAR in both spectral and modal dimensions within a single instrument, thus enriching point cloud data with non-geometric information. The potentially high dimension of MM LiDAR data, however, poses significant challenges for instrumental design, data acquisition, and data processing. MM LiDAR data are structured as several or all modalities are available in each of the spectral channels. The above challenges can thus be mitigated by feature selection (FS), if the structure of the features is taken into account, i.e., if entire spectral channels or entire modalities are selected or omitted. Herein, we focus on the feature selection method for MM LiDAR and propose a multiclass group feature selection algorithm (MGSVM FS) consisting of a structural sparsity-based embedded feature selection method with an all-in-one support vector machine (SVM). It tackles jointly the challenges arising from the high dimension of the MM data and the need for a multiclass classification task while exploiting the structure of the MM data. In addition, we introduce a complete workflow for evaluating the feature selection and for decision-making. We apply the framework to selecting an optimum spectral and modal configuration for remote material classification using an experimental MM LiDAR system that provides reflectance, distance, and degree of linear polarization in 28 spectral channels of 10 nm width. For the experimental investigation, we use MM LiDAR data obtained in a controlled lab environment from thirty specimens of four material classes relevant for construction. Using all three modalities, we find a configuration with only 3 spectral channels that achieves a classification mean-F1 score of 100% within this small dataset. Similar classification performance can also be achieved with only two modalities when using more spectral channels. MGSVM FS improves the classification mean-F1 score by up to 25% as compared to random selection and outperforms two other commonly used filter and embedded feature selection methods, in this application example. The proposed group feature selection algorithm and decision-making are useful for MM LiDAR, providing a link between instrumental design, data acquisition, and data processing. However, they are also transferable to other application fields related to multiclass classification, regression, and knowledge discovery, with features structured in groups. The collected MM feature dataset, the MGSVM FS algorithm, and the evaluation pipeline are accessible online. 1

Group Feature Selection with Multiclass Support Vector Machine

Feature Selection and Parameter Optimization for Support Vector Machines: A New Approach Based on Genetic Algorithm with Feature Chromosomes.

A Feature Selection Method Based on Feature Grouping and Genetic Algorithm

Multi-class feature selection via Sparse Softmax with a discriminative regularization

Feature Selection Via Scaling Factor Integrated Multi-Class Support Vector Machines

Feature Selection For Multi-Class Problems Using Support Vector Machines

A Doubly Sparse Multiclass Support Vector Machine with Simultaneous Feature and Sample Screening

Multi-Class L2,1-Norm Support Vector Machine

A feature selection method for multimodal multispectral LiDAR sensing

Novel Grouping Method-Based Support Vector Machine Plus for Structured Data

Online Multi-label Group Feature Selection

Group-Wise Feature Selection for Supervised Learning

Feature Selection in Multi-instance Learning ∗

A Novel Support Vector Machine with Class-dependent Features for Biomedical Data

Grassmann multimodal implicit feature selection

Feature subset selection for support vector machines through sensitivity analysis

Multitask Feature Selection by Graph-Clustered Feature Sharing

Multitask Multiclass Support Vector Machines

Robust Unsupervised Feature Selection Via Multi-Group Adaptive Graph Representation

Effective Feature Selection Using Feature Vector Graph for Classification

Unsupervised feature selection for multi-cluster data