Abstract:Context: The success of Stack Overflow and other community-based question-and-answer (Q&A) sites depends mainly on the will of their members to answer others' questions. In fact, when formulating requests on Q&A sites, we are not simply seeking for information. Instead, we are also asking for other people's help and feedback. Understanding the dynamics of the participation in Q&A communities is essential to improve the value of crowdsourced knowledge. Objective: In this paper, we investigate how information seekers can increase the chance of eliciting a successful answer to their questions on Stack Overflow by focusing on the following actionable factors: affect, presentation quality, and time. Method: We develop a conceptual framework of factors potentially influencing the success of questions in Stack Overflow. We quantitatively analyze a set of over 87K questions from the official Stack Overflow dump to assess the impact of actionable factors on the success of technical requests. The information seeker reputation is included as a control factor. Furthermore, to understand the role played by affective states in the success of questions, we qualitatively analyze questions containing positive and negative emotions. Finally, a survey is conducted to understand how Stack Overflow users perceive the guideline suggestions for writing questions. Results: We found that regardless of user reputation, successful questions are short, contain code snippets, and do not abuse with uppercase characters. As regards affect, successful questions adopt a neutral emotional style. Conclusion: We provide evidence-based guidelines for writing effective questions on Stack Overflow that software engineers can follow to increase the chance of getting technical help. As for the role of affect, we empirically confirmed community guidelines that suggest avoiding rudeness in question writing.

Exploring The Effect Of Politeness On User Contribution In Q&A Sites: A Case Study Of Stack Overflow

Factors that affect asker's pay intention in trilateral payment-based social Q&A platforms: From a benefit and cost perspective

How to Ask for Technical Help? Evidence-based Guidelines for Writing Questions on Stack Overflow

A Computational Approach to Politeness with Application to Social Factors

Studying Politeness across Cultures using English Twitter and Mandarin Weibo

A Pragmatic Study of Chinese and Western Linguistic Politeness

Understanding Politeness in an Online Community of Practice for Chinese ESL Teachers: Implications for Sustainable Professional Development in the Digital Era

Should We Respect LLMs? A Cross-Lingual Study on the Influence of Prompt Politeness on LLM Performance

Is It Good To Be Like Wikipedia?: Exploring The Trade-Offs Of Introducing Collaborative Editing Model To Q& A Sites

Discovering, Explaining and Summarizing Controversial Discussions in Community Q&A Sites

Application of Cooperative Principle and Politeness Principle in Class Question-answer Process

Research on Digital Etiquette Based on Human-Computer Interaction

Impoliteness in Computer-mediated Communication:Observations from Chinese Fora

Language style and recognition of the answers in health Q&A community: Moderating effects of medical terminology

The Comparison of Politeness Strategies in Chinese Culture and in English Speaking Context

Misunderstanding in Cross-cultural Communication ——A Comparative Study of Expressions of Politeness in French and Chinese

Gender Differences in Participation and Reward on Stack Overflow

Examining Gender and Power on Wikipedia Through Face and Politeness

Politeness theory and computer-mediated communication: a sociolinguistic approach to analyzing relational messages

Towards a Sociolinguistics-Based Framework for the Study of Politeness in Human-Computer Interaction