Abstract:Text-independent speaker recognition using short utterances is a highly challenging task due to the large variation and content mismatch between short utterances. I-vector and probabilistic linear discriminant analysis (PLDA) based systems have become the standard in speaker verification applications, but they are less effective with short utterances. In this paper, we first compare two state-of-the-art universal background model (UBM) training methods for i-vector modeling using full-length and short utterance evaluation tasks. The two methods are Gaussian mixture model (GMM) based (denoted I-vector_GMM) and deep neural network (DNN) based (denoted as I-vector_DNN) methods. The results indicate that the I-vector_DNN system outperforms the I-vector_GMM system under various durations (from full length to 5 s). However, the performances of both systems degrade significantly as the duration of the utterances decreases. To address this issue, we propose two novel nonlinear mapping methods which train DNN models to map the i-vectors extracted from short utterances to their corresponding long-utterance i-vectors. The mapped i-vector can restore missing information and reduce the variance of the original short-utterance i-vectors. The proposed methods both model the joint representation of short and long utterance i-vectors: the first method trains an autoencoder first using concatenated short and long utterance i-vectors and then uses the pre-trained weights to initialize a supervised regression model from the short to long version; the second method jointly trains the supervised regression model with an autoencoder reconstructing the short utterance i-vector itself. Experimental results using the NIST SRE 2010 dataset show that both methods provide significant improvement and result in a 24.51% relative improvement in Equal Error Rates (EERs) from a baseline system. In order to learn a better joint representation, we further investigate the effect of a deep encoder with residual blocks, and the results indicate that the residual network can further improve the EERs of a baseline system by up to 26.47%. Moreover, in order to improve the short i-vector mapping to its long version, an additional vector, which represents the average value of phoneme posteriors across frames, is also added to the input, and results in a 28.43% improvement. When further testing the best-validated models of SRE10 on the Speaker In The Wild (SITW) dataset, the methods result in a 23.12% improvement on arbitrary-duration (1–5 s) short-utterance conditions.

Co-Whitening Of I-Vectors For Short And Long Duration Speaker Verification

Maximum Likelihood I-Vector Space Using PCA for Speaker Verification.

Deep neural network based i-vector mapping for speaker verification using short utterances

A Novel I-Vector Framework Using Multiple Features and PCA for Speaker Recognition in Short Speech Condition

Speaker Verification Using Fisher Vector

Compensation of Intrinsic Variability with Factor Analysis Modeling for Robust Speaker Verification

Improving Speaker Verification Performance Against Long-Term Speaker Variability

Investigation of Using VAE for i-Vector Speaker Verification

Research on generalization property of time-varying Fbank-weighted MFCC for i-vector based speaker verification

A new fast and memory effective i-vector extraction based on factor analysis of KLD derived GMM supervector

Discriminative scoring for speaker recognition based on I-vectors

Xi-Vector Embedding for Speaker Recognition

Sparse Coding Of Total Variability Matrix

Front-End Factor Analysis For Speaker Verification

Y-Vector: Multiscale Waveform Encoder for Speaker Embedding

Geometric Discriminant Analysis for I-vector Based Speaker Verification

Introducing Phonetic Information to Speaker Embedding for Speaker Verification

Weighted Cluster-Range Loss and Criticality-Enhancement Loss for Speaker Recognition

Stacked Bottleneck Features For Speaker Verification

I-vector Based Within Speaker Voice Quality Identification on connected speech

Intrinsic Variation Robust Speaker Verification Based on Sparse Representation.