Abstract:The evolution of defensive coloration is dependent upon a complex combination of variables related to the prey itself, the environmental context, and predator vision/behavior. Some animals reflect ultraviolet (UV) light, which is visible to predators such as birds. Here, we report the first case of UV reflectance by a tadpole (Ololygon machadoi, Hylidae) and we investigate whether it influences tadpole detection/predation by a bird (Saltator similis, Passeriformes) on backgrounds of three different colors (two blending – yellow and dark – and one not blending – blue – to tadpole colors). We also tested whether a previous experience of the birds with the prey species would influence the search/attack effort. Although many predation attempts were recorded, birds did not consume many tadpoles. Birds attempted to/preyed upon more tadpoles on dark backgrounds in the presence rather than the absence of the UV portion of the spectrum; attempt/predation on the other backgrounds (yellow, blue) did not change between the UV conditions. The differential contrast of dark and yellow tadpole body parts against specific backgrounds may aid to disruptive properties. The interruption of tadpole body contour was probably enough to prevent detection on yellow and blue backgrounds based on low achromatic contrasts of yellow and dark body parts against such backgrounds, respectively. On dark backgrounds, however, an increase in the chromatic contrast of yellow bars caused by UV reflectance may have reached a threshold and increased tadpole detectability. Birds spent more time searching for tadpoles and visited more frequently the trays in the first than in the second trial, and several tadpoles were regurgitated after ingestion, suggesting that the existence of a potential aposematic role of the UV reflectance cannot be disregarded. Birds also spent more time inspecting blue backgrounds, which may relate to their unfamiliarity with such backgrounds. UV reflectance in O. machadoi tadpoles unveals a potential adaptative value of this feature for the larval stage, and our results indicate influence on tadpole detection by birds. The effects of such adaptation in natural habitats and its occurrence in other species deserve further studies.

I remember you! Multicomponent warning signals and predator memory

It’s a Matter of Taste: Avian Predators Taste Reject Mimetic Prey in Relation to Signal Reliability

Avian predators taste reject mimetic prey in relation to their signal reliability

Context-dependent coloration of prey and predator decision making in contrasting light environments

Modality specific memory enhancement in butterflies

Exploring polymorphism in a palatable prey: predation risk and frequency dependence in relation to distinct levels of conspicuousness

Prey detection by a stepwise visual template matching mechanism

How conspicuous are peacock eyespots and other colorful feathers in the eyes of mammalian predators?

Stimulus intensity and temporal configuration interact during bimodal learning and memory in honey bees

Detectability is in the eye of the beholder—the role of UV reflectance on tadpole detection and predation by a passerine bird

Comparative Assessment of Food Preferences and Aversions Acquired by Blackbirds via Observational Learning

Learn and live: predator experience and feeding history determines prey behaviour and survival

Pattern Matters in the Aposematic Colouration of Papilio polytes Butterflies

Discriminative Learning of Similar Objects Enhances Memory for the Objects and Contexts

Do coral reef fish learn to avoid unpalatable prey using visual cues?

Multisensory learning binds neurons into a cross-modal memory engram

Can video playback provide social information for foraging blue tits?

Comparative cognition: Free-living birds remember things past

Modeling within-session dynamics of categorical and item-memory mechanisms in pigeons

Target recognition and lure rejection: Two sides of the same memorability coin?

Color pattern facilitates species recognition but not signal detection: a field test using robots