Efficacy and influencing factors of CO2 laser, topical photodynamic therapy versus therapy combined with CO2 laser pretreatment for vaginal low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions with high-risk HPV infection

Yuling Li,Yingting Wei,Jinhua Huang,Liying Gu,Zubei Hong,Lihua Qiu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdpdt.2024.104017
IF: 3.577
2024-04-01
Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy
Abstract:BACKGROUND: Vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia (VaIN) is a group of diseases of squamous epithelial dysplasia and carcinoma in situ occurring in the vagina, which is associated with high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) infection.OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of Carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) laser, 5-aminolevulinic acid photodynamic therapy (PDT) and PDT combined with CO<sub>2</sub> laser pretreatment for VaIN1 with HR-HPV infection, and analyze the factors affecting the clearance of HR-HPV.METHODS: Patients with HR-HPV infection and pathological diagnosis of VaIN1 and received laser or PDT or PDT combined with laser pretreatment were recruited. A total of 45 patients received one to three times CO<sub>2</sub> laser (laser Group), 15 patients received three times PDT (PDT Group) and 15 patients received CO<sub>2</sub> laser once and PDT three times (laser + PDT Group). HPV testing, cytology and colposcopy examinations at 3-6 months and 9-12 months after treatment were analyzed to assess the outcomes of the treatment.RESULTS: There was no significant difference in regression rate of VaIN1 among the laser Group, the PDT Group and the laser + PDT Group (3-6 month follow-up: 57.78% vs 73.3% vs 80 %, 9-12 month follow-up: 68.89% vs 80% vs 86.67 %, P&gt;0.05). HR-HPV remission rates were also similar in the three groups (3-6 month follow-up: 26.67% vs 46.67% vs 46.67 %, 9-12 month follow-up: 40 % in all groups, P&gt;0.05). Compared to HR-HPV negative group, patients in the HR-HPV positive group were older and had more pregnancies. Menopause and multiple vaginal lesions were more common in the HR-HPV positive group. Adverse reactions were mild in the PDT Group. The laser Group and the laser + PDT Group had more adverse effects, such as increased vaginal secretion, vaginal bleeding, scarring and local pain.CONCLUSION: For patients with VaIN1 at risk of progression, ALA-PDT presents itself as a viable choice for those who are well-informed and can consent to its costs and benefits. The addition of CO<sub>2</sub> laser pretreatment may not increase the benefit of ALA-PDT treatment of VaIN1. Older age, menopause, more times of pregnancies, and multiple vaginal lesions might affect HR-HPV regression.
oncology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?