Abstract:Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science, Volume 32, Issue 6, June 2022. Previous studies on network robustness mainly concentrated on hub node failures with fully known network structure information. However, hub nodes are often well protected and not accessible to damage or malfunction in a real-world networked system. In addition, one can only gain insight into limited network connectivity knowledge due to large-scale properties and dynamic changes of the network itself. In particular, two different aggression patterns are present in a network attack: memory based attack, in which failed nodes are not attacked again, or non-memory based attack; that is, nodes can be repeatedly attacked. Inspired by these motivations, we propose an attack pattern with and without memory based on randomly choosing [math] non-hub nodes with known connectivity information. We use a network system with the Poisson and power-law degree distribution to study the network robustness after applying two failure strategies of non-hub nodes. Additionally, the critical threshold [math] and the size of the giant component [math] are determined for a network configuration model with an arbitrary degree distribution. The results indicate that the system undergoes a continuous second-order phase transition subject to the above attack strategies. We find that [math] gradually tends to be stable after increasing rapidly with [math]. Moreover, the failure of non-hub nodes with a higher degree is more destructive to the network system and makes it more vulnerable. Furthermore, from comparing the attack strategies with and without memory, the results highlight that the system shows better robustness under a non-memory based attack relative to memory based attacks for [math]. Attacks with memory can block the system's connectivity more efficiently, which has potential applications in real-world systems. Our model sheds light on network resilience under memory and non-memory based attacks with limited information attacks and provides valuable insights into designing robust real-world systems.

How Does Node Resilience Effect on Complex Networks?

Resilience centrality in complex networks.

Node-Level Resilience Loss in Dynamic Complex Networks

Resilience Evaluation of Complex Networks with Attack Intensity

The resilience of interdependent transportation networks under targeted attack

Dynamical Resilience of Networks Against Targeted Attack

Identifying Vulnerable Nodes of Complex Networks in Cascading Failures Induced by Node-Based Attacks

A Resilience Analysis Method for Distributed System Based on Complex Network

Cascade-based Attack Vulnerability in Complex Networks

Simulating Resilience in Transaction-Oriented Networks

Efficiency of Complex Networks under Failures and Attacks: A Percolation Approach

Cascading Failure Model and Resilience-Based Sequential Recovery Strategy for Complex Networks

The Dynamic Correlation Between Degree and Betweenness of Complex Network under Attack

Statistical Properties and Resilience of Local-world Networks

Vulnerability of Complex Networks under Multiple Node-Based Attacks

Cascade Phenomenon Against Subsequent Failures in Complex Networks

Universal Cascading Failures on Complex Networks Based on Attacks

Recent progress on the resilience of complex networks

Network resilience of non-hub nodes failure under memory and non-memory based attacks with limited information

Maximizing Network Resilience against Malicious Attacks

Resilience Of Spatial Networks