Abstract:Legal Judgment Prediction (LJP) is an essential component of legal assistant systems, which aims to automatically predict judgment results from a given criminal fact description. As a vital subtask of LJP, researchers have paid little attention to the numerical LJP, i.e., the prediction of imprisonment and penalty. Existing methods ignore numerical information in the criminal facts, making their performances far from satisfactory. For instance, the amount of theft varies, as do the prison terms and penalties. The major challenge is how the model can obtain the ability of numerical comparison and magnitude perception, e.g., 400 < 500 < 800, 500 is closer to 400 than to 800. To this end, we propose a judicial knowledge-enhanced magnitude-aware reasoning architecture, called NumLJP, for the numerical LJP task. Specifically, we first implement a contrastive learning-based judicial knowledge selector to distinguish confusing criminal cases efficiently. Unlike previous approaches that employ the law article as external knowledge, judicial knowledge is a quantitative guideline in real scenarios. It contains many numerals (called anchors) that can construct a reference frame. Then we design a masked numeral prediction task to help the model remember these anchors to acquire legal numerical commonsense from the selected judicial knowledge. We construct a scale-based numerical graph using the anchors and numerals in facts to perform magnitude-aware numerical reasoning. Finally, the representations of fact description, judicial knowledge, and numerals are fused to make decisions. We conduct extensive experiments on three real-world datasets and select several competitive baselines. The results demonstrate that the macro-F1 of NumLJP improves by at least 9.53% and 11.57% on the prediction of penalty and imprisonment, respectively.

Evaluating the Rationality of Judicial Decision with LSTM-Based Case Modeling

A Markov Logic Networks Based Method to Predict Judicial Decisions of Divorce Cases

Towards Interactivity and Interpretability: A Rationale-based Legal Judgment Prediction Framework.

Legal Judgment Prediction with Multiple Perspectives on Civil Cases

Automatic Judgment Prediction via Legal Reading Comprehension

A Predictive Performance Comparison of Machine Learning Models for Judicial Cases.

Legal Judgment Prediction with Multi-Stage Case Representation Learning in the Real Court Setting

Evaluation System for Reasoning Description of Judgment Documents Based on TensorFlow CNN.

A Deep Learning Method for Judicial Decision Support

Efficient Prediction of Judicial Case Decisions Based on State Space Modeling

Legal Judgment Prediction with Multi-Stage CaseRepresentation Learning in the Real Court Setting

Automatically Classify Chinese Judgment Documents Utilizing Machine Learning Algorithms

A Comprehensive Evaluation of Large Language Models on Legal Judgment Prediction

From Calculation to Adjudication: Examining LLM judges on Mathematical Reasoning Tasks

Case Retrieval for Legal Judgment Prediction in Legal Artificial Intelligence

Big-Data Measurement-Model Research about Judges’ Actual Workload in China

Judgment Prediction Based on Tensor Decomposition With Optimized Neural Networks

Efficient Prediction of Court Judgments Using an LSTM+CNN Neural Network Model with an Optimal Feature Set

Judicial knowledge-enhanced magnitude-aware reasoning for numerical legal judgment prediction

HD-LJP: A Hierarchical Dependency-based Legal Judgment Prediction Framework for multi-task learning