Metastasis‐free survival of uveal melanoma by tumour size category based on The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) classification in 1001 cases

Rolika Bansal,Hidayet Sener,Arupa Ganguly,Jerry A. Shields,Carol L. Shields
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ceo.14446
2024-10-05
Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology
Abstract:Background Uveal melanoma (UM) can be classified by tumour size category and by The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) groups (cytogenetic‐based, 4‐category prognostic classification into Groups A‐D). This study was conducted to assess impact on metastasis‐free survival (MFS) in UM by tumour size category based on correlation with TCGA classification. Methods Retrospective analysis of 1001 cases categorised as small (0.0–3.0 mm), medium (3.1–8.0 mm) and large (≥8.1 mm), grouped by TCGA classification. Results Of 1001 cases, TCGA Groups (A/B/C/D) included small (n = 270, 75%/11%/13%/1%), medium (n = 503, 46%/14%/27%/13%) and large (n = 228, 23%/19%/38%/20%) UM. The 5‐and 10‐year Kaplan–Meier MFS for small UM revealed Group A (98%, 98%), Group B (100%, 100%), Group C (86%, NA) and Group D (100%, NA). For medium UM, the values dropped with Group A (95%, 93%), Group B (90%, 90%), Group C (68%, 38%), and Group D (44%, NA). For large UM, the values dropped further with Group A (94%, 86%), Group B (85%, NA), Group C (40%, 28%), and Group D (23%, NA). Additionally, a comparison (small vs. medium vs. large tumour size category) revealed TCGA low‐risk grouping (Groups A or B) in 86% vs. 60% vs. 58% cases with UM. Conclusion By tumour size category, favourable cytogenetics (Groups A or B) is found in 86% of small tumours, 60% of medium tumours, and 58% of large tumours. The MFS at 10 years for favourable cytogenetics was 98% for small tumours, 92% for medium tumours, and 54% for large tumours. Tumour size category can serve as a surrogate for TCGA.
ophthalmology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?