Abstract:Introduction: Recent data emerges that transplantation with reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) seems to be effective as myeloablative conditioning (MAC). However, relapse is a major concern with RIC, and identification of patients at equivalent probability of relapse irrespective of conditioning intensity is needed. Method: A total of 567 AML patients underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) betwene June 2012 and Jan 2018. For this study, we selected 287 patients who fulfilled i) intermediate or poor risk group by NCCN (2017.Version 3), ii) CR or CRi at HSCT, iii) received either MAC (BuCy or CyTBI) or RIC (FluBu2TBI400) peripheral blood stem cell transplant from 8/8 matched sibling donor (MSD) or matched unrelated donor (MUD), and iv) having bone marrow Wilms tumor gene 1 (WT1) expression results before transplant. The association between conditioning intensity, WT1 level at HSCT and post-transplant clinical outcomes involving overall survival (OS), disease free survival (DFS), cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) and nonrelapse mortality (NRM) were evaluated first. And then we attempted to compare post-tranpslant outcomes between MAC and RIC groups in pre-transplant WT1low patients only. Results: Among the total 287 patients, 232 (80.8%) and 55 (19.2%) patients received MAC and RIC transplant. The median WT1 gene expression level at diagnosis (assessable in 255 patients) was 2310.0 copies/104ABL. When ≥ 250 copies/104ABL were classified as high expression of WT1 (WT1high), 77.3% (n=197) showed WT1high at AML diagnosis. In multivariate analysis, older age and WT1high before HSCT were designated as independent prognostic factor for inferior OS, DFS and higher CIR, and NCCN risk group at diagnosis was significantly associated with incidence of relapse; whereas, conditioning intensity or WT1 level at diagnosis were not prognostic for post transplant outcomes. After excluding patients without available information on initial WT1 level (n=32), whose WT1 levels were not overexpressed at diagnosis (n=58), and whose WT1 level ≥ 250 copies before transplant (n=45), we finally selected 152 pre-trasnplant WT1low patients for further analysis. Older age was still a significant independent factor for poor OS, DFS and higher NRM, whereas NCCN risk stratification at diagnosis was no longer prognostic for post-transplant outcomes in pre-trasnplant WT1low patients only. There was no significant difference in these outcomes between MAC (n=123) and RIC (n=29) patients, and pre-HSCT WT1 level as continuous variable remain significant for predicting relapse even if the level was below 250 copies. Conclusion: Post-transplant survival or relapse did not differ by conditioning intensity in AML CR1 patients whose WT1 level was below 250 copies per 104 ABL at transplant. Figure Disclosures Kim: BMS: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Il-Yang co.: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding. Lee:Alexion: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Achillion: Research Funding. Kim:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Astellas: Consultancy, Honoraria; Hanmi: Consultancy, Honoraria; AGP: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; SL VaxiGen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy; Amgen: Honoraria; Chugai: Honoraria; Yuhan: Honoraria; Sanofi-Genzyme: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Handok: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Daiichi Sankyo: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Otsuka: Honoraria; BL & H: Research Funding.

Reduced toxicity (FluBu3) versus myeloablative (BuCy) conditioning in acute myeloid leukemia patients who received first allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in measurable residual disease-negative CR1

[Study on Unrelated Donor Allogeneic Bone Marrow Transplantation with Bu-CY2 Conditioning Regimen for Myelodysplastic Syndrome].

Graft-Versus-Host Disease Following Myeloablative Busulfan Plus Fludarabine And Busulfan Plus Cyclophosphamide For Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation In Acute Myeloid Leukemia In First Complete Remission

Efficacy of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Intermediate-Risk Acute Myeloid Leukemia Adult Patients in First Complete Remission: A Meta-Analysis of Prospective Studies.

Myeloablative Buflu Conditioning Is Well Tolerated And Can Achieve Even Better Outcomes In Hla-Mismatched Donor Transplantation For Intermediate- And High-Risk Aml Patients In Complete Remission

Long-Term Efficacy Analysis of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in the Treatment of Acute Myeloid Leukemia Using Melphalan Instead of Cyclophosphamide As a Myeloablative Conditioning Regimen

Evaluate the Efficacy of Myeloablative Conditioning Regimens for Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Acute Myelogenous Leukemia at BTH, Vietnam

Control Study of Fludarabine Instead of Cyclophosphamide in Modified Busulfan-Cyclophosphamide As a Myeloablative Conditioning Regimen for Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Treatment of Acute Leukemia

Busulfan Plus Fludarabine Compared With Busulfan Plus Cyclophosphamide for AML Undergoing HLA-Haploidentical Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: A Multicenter Randomized Phase III Trial

Comparison of Myeloablative (CyTBI, BuCy) Versus Reduced-Intensity (FluBu2TBI400) Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation in Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients with Low WT1 Expression Level at Transplant

Comparative analysis of reduced toxicity conditioning regimens between fludarabine plus melphalan and fludarabine plus busulfex in adult patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia

[Reduced Intensity of BuCy Conditioning Regimen for Transplantation in the Treatment of Malignant Hematologic Diseases].

Fludarabine- and Low-Dose Cyclophosphamide-Based Conditioning Regimens for Unmanipulated Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation from Unrelated Donors and Matched Siblings in Patients with Fanconi Anemia: Results from the Cbmtr

Sequential Conditioning Does Not Improve Outcomes of Allogeneic Stemcell Transplantation in CMML Patients

Combination of Busulfan with Increased-Dose of Fludarabine As Conditioning Regimen for MDS and MDS-AML Patients with Allo-Hsct

Fludarabine, busulfan, and melphalan conditioning regimen in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for adult patients with myeloid malignancies: A multicenter retrospective study

Effect of Two Conditionings on Relapse in Myelodysplastic Syndrome and Secondary Acute Myeloid Leukemia Undergoing Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

Reduced intensity conditioning for acute myeloid leukemia using melphalan- vs busulfan-based regimens: a CIBMTR report

Sequential Conditioning With FLAMSA Does Not Improve Outcomes of Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation in Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia Patients

The Efficacy of Modified Melphalan and Busulfan-Based Conditioning Regimen for Autologous-HSCT in Low-Risk and Intermediate-Risk AML Patients

Comparison of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Versus Chemotherapy in Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia in First Remission