Abstract:Modern aircraft is a man-machine-cooperate complex system. The issues which affect the aviation safety gradually become human factors. Statistical reports show that more than 70% of the civil aircraft accidents are caused by human because of the misuse, abuse and disuse of the automatic systems. Several studies have been made, trying to reveal the reasons of human induced safety issues. Many of them consider workload as a main reason. Studies show that too high or too low of workload would both have higher probability of human errors. The state of art workload measurement techniques are generally organized into three broad categories: subjective rating scales, task performance measures and psychophysiological measures. There are some disadvantages in the conventional workload measuring techniques. Subjective rating scales couldn’t provide continuous evaluation in the flight task and the results could be affected by participants’ emotion and performance etc. The performance measures overlook the operator’s initiatives and effort. The mechanisms of the physiological reactions are complex, and the physiological measures could be easily contaminated by environmental changes such as illumination, pressure and vibration. We proposed a method to evaluate the human factors in a flight task based on multiple objective measures. In the presented method, the objective measures include the pilot’s eye activities, control activities, cardio-respiratory reactions and the flight status parameters. Principal component analysis was applied to integrate the above objective measures into four meaningful aspects. Meanwhile, in order to link the cockpit components (e.g. the displays and the control equipment) to the pilot and the flight performance, four correlation aspects were also considered which include the correlation between the pilot’s cognitive activity and the pilot’s arousal, the correlation between the pilot’s control activity and the pilot’s arousal, the correlation between the pilot’s cognitive activity and the flight performance and the correlation between the pilot’s control activity and the flight performance. These correlation aspects could provide diagnostic information in the assessment of the design of the cockpit components. We also constructed an eight-dimension pattern to integrate the above eight aspects and achieved an intuitive and continuous evaluation of the inflight human factors in the flight deck.

Mapping System Between Passenger Experience And The Factors Of Aircraft Cabin Design

Factor Model for Passenger Experience in the Aircraft Cabin Design

Identifying and analyzing critical factors impacting on passenger comfort employing a hybrid model

An Investigation of Key Factors Influencing Aircraft Comfort Experience

Comfort evaluation of aircraft cabin system employing a hybrid model

Comfort Evaluation of an Aircraft Cabin System Employing a Hybrid Model

The Comfort Evaluation in Civil Aircraft Cabin Based on Objective and Subjective Weighting Method

Passenger Experience Revisited: in Commercial Aircraft Cabin Design and Operations' Sights

The Comfort Model of Seat Space Based on Anthropometry and Seats Pressure Distribution

An Evaluation Model for the Comfort of Vehicle Intelligent Cockpits Based on Passenger Experience

The Passengers' Comfort Improvement by Sitting Activity and Posture Analysis in Civil Aircraft Cabin

A hybrid approach based on rough-AHP for evaluation in-flight service quality

Effect of Personal Space Invasion on Passenger Comfort and Comfort Design of an Aircraft Cabin

An approach for prioritizing key factors affecting air travel experience based on grey theory and DEMATEL.

Measurement of environment parameters and investigation of passengers'comfort in domestic aircraft cabin

Evaluation of Interior Environment Aircraft Passenger Cabin Based on QFD and AHP

Ergonomics Evaluation Of Cabin Human-Machine Interface Based On Shel Model

Passenger-centric factors influencing the experience of aircraft comfort

A comprehensive evaluation model for the intelligent automobile cockpit comfort

Multidimensional Cockpit Ergonomics Evaluation System

Enhancing aircraft cabin comfort to compete with high‐speed trains: A survey in China