Assessing an Architecture's Ability to Support Feature Evolution

Ran Mo,Yuanfang Cai,Rick Kazman,Qiong Feng

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3196321.3196346

2018-01-01

Abstract:Enabling rapid feature delivery is essential for product success and is therefore a goal of software architecture design. But how can we determine if and to what extent an architecture is "good enough" to support feature addition and evolution, or determine if a refactoring effort is successful in that features can be added more easily? In this paper, we contribute a concept called the Feature Space, and a formal definition of Feature Dependency, derived from a software project’s revision history. We capture the dependency relations among the features of a system in a feature dependency structure matrix (FDSM), using features as first-class design elements. We also propose a Feature Decoupling Level (FDL) metric that can be used to measure the level of independence among features. Our investigation of 17 open source projects shows that files within each feature space are much more likely to be changed together, hence each feature space forms a meaningful maintainable unit that should be treated separately. The data also show that the history-based FDL is highly correlated a structure-based maintainability metric: Decoupling Level (DL). When we examine a project’s evolution history, we see that if a system is well-modularized, it is more likely that features can be added independently. For shorter periods of time, however, FDL and DL may not be consistent, e.g., when the addition of new features deviates from the designed architecture or does not involve parts of the system that have architecture flaws. In such cases, FDL and FDSM can be used to monitor potential architecture degradation caused by improper feature addition.