Homoeolog Expression is Modulated Differently by Different Subgenomes in Brassica Napus Hybrids and Allotetraploids

Dawei Zhang,Qi Pan,Chen Tan,Lili Liu,Xianhong Ge,Zaiyun Li,Mingli Yan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11105-018-1087-x
2018-01-01
Plant Molecular Biology Reporter
Abstract:Synthetic and natural allotetraploid Brassica napus (2n = 38, AACC) have been widely used as a model to study the genetic changes associated with allopolyploidization; however, there has been little research on the homoeolog expression patterns and the roles of cis and trans regulation. Herein, homoeolog expression patterns were assessed by using RNA-seq for two interspecific hybrids (A n C o with the extracted A subgenome from natural B. napus , and A r C o with the A subgenome from extant B. rapa ), synthetic and natural allopolyploids (C o C o A r A r and A n A n C n C n ), and the diploid parents. The ranges of homoeolog expression bias decreased after hybridization, whereas the extents of homoeolog expression bias and non-conserved expression, especially transgressive expression, increased over evolutionary time. Despite sharing the same C subgenome parent, these two hybrids showed different homolog expression patterns in many respects. In A n C o , the trans- regulatory factors from C o subgenome tended to cause downregulation of A n subgenome homoeologs, but trans- regulatory factors from the A n subgenome acted as both activators and repressors, and such asymmetric effects of trans- regulatory factors might explain why the homoeolog expression was biased toward the C subgenome after genome merger. No significant asymmetric effects of trans- regulatory factors were found in A r C o , which was consistent with the overall balanced expression of homoeologs. These results suggested that A subgenomes with different regulatory systems might act differently in modulating homoeolog expression after merger with the C subgenome, resulting in either balanced or unbalanced homoeolog expression biases.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?