Cognitive Bias in the Patient Encounter: Part II. Debiasing using an adaptive toolbox

Christine J Ko,Jeffrey R Gehlhausen,Jeffrey M Cohen,Yiqun Jiang,Peggy Myung,Pat Croskerry,Christine J. Ko,Jeffrey R. Gehlhausen,Jeffrey M. Cohen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2024.02.061
IF: 15.487
2024-04-09
Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
Abstract:Cognitive bias may lead to medical error, and awareness of cognitive pitfalls is a potential first step to addressing the negative consequences of cognitive bias (see Part 1). For decision-making processes that occur under uncertainty, which encompass most physician decisions, a so-called "adaptive toolbox" is beneficial for good decisions. The adaptive toolbox is inclusive of broad strategies like cultural humility, emotional intelligence, and self-care that help combat implicit bias, negative consequences of affective bias, and optimize cognition. Additionally, the adaptive toolbox includes situational-specific tools such as heuristics, narratives, cognitive forcing functions, and fast and frugal trees. Such tools may mitigate against errors due to cultural, affective, and cognitive bias. Part 2 of this two-part series covers metacognition and cognitive bias in relation to broad and specific strategies aimed at better decision-making.
dermatology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?