Global carbon budget and emissions pathway of 2℃ and 1.5℃ target

CUI Xue-qin,WANG Ke,FU Sha,ZOU Ji
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-6923.2017.11.041
2017-01-01
Abstract:By collecting up-to-date global emissions scenario results, we analyzed the range of global carbon budget of 2 ℃ and 1.5℃ target set by the Paris Agreement, and compared mitigation requirements of key time points, time of emission peaking and carbon neutral, and scales of negative emissions technologies application, of different emissions pathways. Compared to 2℃ target, global remaining carbon budget will be halved, more rapid mitigation will be required from 2020 onwards, and negative emissions technologies will be more heavily relied on. Delaying near-term mitigation action will strongly reduce future carbon budget, thus require deeper mitigation in mid and long term. Annual reduction rate will be required to increase by 1.2%, and net-zero emissions need to be reached 20years earlier; global carbon budget could be allocated to countries through different effort-sharing schemes. Regional distribution of global carbon budget is closely related to the chosen effort-sharing schemes. Resource-sharing schemes are more favourable for the United States and Europe, while burden-sharing ones are more favourable for China and India.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?