Outcomes of Interfacility VV-Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Transfers: A Multicenter Study

Conner Olson,Jillian Wothe,Jacob Braaten,Danika Evans,Karl Damroth,John Bohman,Troy Seelhammer,Ramiro Saavedra-Romero,Matthew Prekker,Melissa Brunsvold
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/mat.0000000000002133
2024-01-19
ASAIO Journal
Abstract:As the availability of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) expands, so has the need for interfacility transfer to ECMO centers. However, the impact of these transfers is unknown. We hypothesized that interfacility transfers would be associated with increased complications and mortality. This retrospective cohort study includes adult patients treated with venovenous (VV) ECMO at all four adult ECMO centers comprising our statewide registry. Complications, mortality, ECMO duration, length of stay, and disposition were compared based on cannulation at an ECMO center versus outside hospital and transferred by air versus ground after adjusting for baseline covariates/parameters. The study included 420 adult patients, 36% of whom were cannulated at an outside institution before transfer. Of these, 63% were transported by ground and the remainder by air. Risk adjusted logistic regression revealed similar odds of mortality between those cannulated at ECMO centers versus referring hospital and then transported (odds ratio [OR] = 0.77, confidence interval [CI] = 0.49–1.22). This study supports the practice of interfacility ECMO transfer.
engineering, biomedical,transplantation
What problem does this paper attempt to address?