Abstract:Clinicians typically make the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) from the clinical findings and then prescribe acid-suppressing drugs. Endoscopy is usually done for persistent or severe symptoms. Esophageal function tests (EFTs: esophageal manometry and 24-hr pH monitoring) are generally reserved for patients who have the most severe disease, including those being considered for surgery. We hypothesized that EFTs are more accurate than symptoms and endoscopy in the diagnosis of GERD. This was a retrospective study undertaken in a university tertiary care center. Between October 1989 and November 1998, 822 patients with a clinical diagnosis of GERD (based on symptoms and endoscopic findings) were referred for EFTs. The patients were divided into two groups depending on whether the 24-hr pH monitoring score showed GERD (group A, GERD−; group B, GERD+). The groups were compared with respect to the incidence and severity of symptoms, presence of a hiatal hernia on barium x-rays, presence and severity of esophagitis on endoscopy, and esophageal motility. In all, 247 patients (30%) had normal reflux scores (group A, GERD−), and 575 patients (70%) had abnormal scores (Group B, GERD+). Eighty percent of group A and 88% of group B had been treated with acid-suppressing medications. The incidence of heartburn and regurgitation was similar in the two groups. Grade I–II esophagitis was diagnosed by endoscopy in 25% of group A and 35% of group B, and grade III esophagitis in 4% of group A and 11% of group B. Esophageal manometry showed that group B more often had esophageal dysmotility, consisting of a hypotensive lower esophageal sphincter and abnormal esophageal peristalsis. These data show that: (1) symptoms were unreliable for diagnosing GERD; (2) endoscopic evidence of grade I–II esophagitis was diagnostically nonspecific, and grade III was much less certain than claimed in other reports; and (3) pH monitoring identified patients with GERD and stratified them according to the severity of the disease. We conclude that esophageal manometry and pH monitoring are important in diagnosing GERD accurately. More liberal use of these tests early in patient management would avoid much improper and costly medical therapy and would help single out for special attention the patients with GERD who have the most severe disease.

Incomplete Response of Gastroesophageal Reflux Symptoms Poorly Predicts Erosive Esophagitis or Barrett’s Esophagus

Risk Factors for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease, Reflux Esophagitis and Non-Erosive Reflux Disease among Chinese Patients Undergoing Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Examination

Empirical treatment based on “typical” reflux symptoms is inappropriate in a population with a high prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection

Clinical Characteristics and Esophageal Function Tests of Refractory Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

Developing a Diagnostic Understanding of GERD Phenotypes Through the Analysis of Levels of Mucosal Injury, Immune Activation, and Psychological Comorbidity.

An Analysis of 342 Patients with Refractory Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Symptoms Using Questionnaires, High-Resolution Manometry, and Impedance-Ph Monitoring.

Concomitant irritable bowel syndrome is associated with failure of step-down on-demand proton pump inhibitor treatment in patients with gastro-esophageal reflux disease.

Relationship among Symptoms, Mucosal Injury, and Acid Exposure in Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

Current Diagnosis and Management of Suspected Reflux Symptoms Refractory to Proton Pump Inhibitor Therapy

Psychological Results of 438 Patients with Persisting Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Symptoms by Symptom Checklist 90-Revised Questionnaire

Psychological symptoms do not discriminate between reflux phenotypes along the organic-functional refractory GERD spectrum

Prevalence of functional esophageal disorders and associated clinical characteristics in patients with proton‐pump‐inhibitor‐unresponsive reflux symptoms

Symptoms and Endoscopic Findings in the Diagnosis of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

Diagnosis of Symptomatic Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

Analysis of 36 Cases of Refractory Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease with Impedance-pH Monitoring

Physiological And Psychological Factors Contribute To Real-Time Esophageal Symptom Reporting In Refractory Reflux Patients

Inverse correlation between gastroesophageal reflux disease and atrophic gastritis assessed by endoscopy and serology

The Role of Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress in Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Symptoms and Treatment

Role of Esophageal Function Tests in Diagnosis of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

The psychological results of 438 patients with persisting GERD symptoms by Symptom Checklist 90-Revised (SCL-90-R) questionnaire.

Risk Factors for Refractory Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease