Plant root diameter detection in arid areas by GPR multi-algorithm joint iterative inversion

崔凡,李思远,王丽冰等
2017-01-01
Abstract:Background: Using the hyperbola of a diffraction wave caused by the typical circular section anomaly in GPR profiles to calculate the target diameter directly is a widely used method. This method suffers from randomness and high error. Therefore, finding an accurate method for diameter determination in plant roots, and calculation of the biomass, play an important role in ecological construction in arid areas. Results: An iterative joint inversion method based on three algorithms: cross-correlation, least square, and golden section, was used. Firstly, according to the FDTD (Finite-Difference Time-Domain) principle, we model the spatial distribution of shallow plant roots, and acquire the hyperbolic image of the target diffraction wave. After that, we determine the delay between adjacent data traces in the forward modelling and detect coordinate points along the hyperbola by cross-correlation. We then construct the fitted hyperbola equation based on the least squares principle. Finally, by using the golden section search algorithm, the value of the target diameter can be iteratively inverted. Aiming at the measured radar data, to verify the applicability and accuracy of the diameter inversion, a conventional method based on the time interval between reflection of root tops and bottoms for calculating the diameter is introduced, and we compared the diameter calculated (inverted) by the two methods and actual value. Conclusions: Based on the forward modelling data, the relative error in the joint iterative inversion was 1.8% to 5.7%, and its mean value was 3.33%: the inversion effect was thus preferable. According to the diameters calculated (inverted) from radar data, the relative error between actual diameter and calculated diameter was 6.0% to 12.1%, and the mean value was 9.39%; however, the joint iterative inverted diameters were within 3.5% to 6.7%, with a mean value of 4.85%. The correlation coefficient R2 between calculated, and actual, values was 0.897, but inversion result is more close to reality: its correlation coefficient R2 was 0.9557. This shows the applicability and accuracy of the joint iterative inversion diameter method.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?