Motivational Interviewing for Hoarding Disorder and Social Relationships in Rural-Dwelling Older Adults
Caitlyn Nix,Darby Mackenstadt,Mary Dozier
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jagp.2024.01.188
IF: 7.996
2024-02-21
American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
Abstract:Introduction Hoarding disorder is a potentially debilitating condition that occurs at a higher rate and severity in older adults (Cath et al., 2017; Dozier et al., 2016). Symptoms such as excessive clutter and difficulty discarding may result in an unusable household that is both a fall risk and fire hazard (Diefenbach et al., 2013; Dozier & Porter, 2020). Often, hoarding disorder results in increased levels of social isolation (Davidson et al., 2020), which can result in negative health outcomes in older adults (Barnes et al., 2022). Social isolation in hoarding disorder is thought to be partially driven by the effects of excessive clutter on close social contacts of individuals with hoarding symptoms (Tolin et al., 2008; Wilbram et al., 2008). Thus, a potential secondary benefit of engaging in treatment for hoarding disorder is an increase in social connectedness and satisfaction. Project RECLAIM (Reduce Clutter and Increase Meaning in Your Life) is a novel, home-based intervention for hoarding disorder in rural-dwelling older adults that utilizes motivational interviewing in tandem with sorting practice (practice making decisions about what to keep and discard). During one-hour sessions in participants' homes, clinicians use reported reasons for discarding to increase motivation and commitment to change. The home-based element allows for sorting and conversations about ambivalence to occur in real time and decreases barriers to treatment for this rural-dwelling population. Rural areas have several barriers to care, including limited number of providers available, decreased access to public transportation, higher travel times and distance to treatment, and higher rates of stigma related to seeking mental health treatment. This study investigated levels of self-rated Emotional Support, Instrumental Support, Friendship, Loneliness, Perceived Rejection, and Perceived Hostility in a sample of rural-dwelling older adults aged 50 and older enrolled in the Project RECLAIM treatment study (n = 14). Methods Adults aged 50 and older completed six sessions of motivational interviewing in the pilot study (n = 10) or eight sessions in the ongoing treatment study (n = 4). Participants completed a baseline assessment and post-treatment assessment in the pilot study, and participants in the ongoing clinical trial completed a monthly assessment every four sessions. Participants completed a series of questionnaires from the NIH Toolbox Emotion Battery to assess emotional functioning (Babakhanyan et al., 2018). All measures were T-scored by the software using national normative data for adults. Measures of Emotional Support, Instrumental Support, Perceived Rejection, Friendship, and Loneliness were of interest for this study due to their classification as Social Relationship measures under the NIH Emotion Battery. Participant scores on measures from the first assessment to the second were classified into Below Average, Average, and Above Average categories based on common neuropsychological cut-off values for classification of assessment T-scores (Heaton et al., 2004). Results At baseline, approximately 36% of the sample was in the Average range for Emotional Support, with an average change of -0.57 in scores from the first assessment to the second. Fewer participants reported Average levels of Instrumental Support at the first assessment (28%) with an increase of 2.36 points on average by the second assessment. Approximately 43% of the sample reported Average satisfaction with Friendship, with an average reduction of -1.5 points. For Perceived Rejection, 14% were in the Average range, with 64% reporting Above Average Perceived Rejection at baseline. Change scores for Perceived Rejection from the first to second assessment had a wide range for (-11 to +9), but the average overall change was zero. In contrast, the average change over time for Perceived Hostility was - 2.93. At baseline, 71% of participants reported Above Average perceptions of hostility from others, while at the second assessment the proportion of participants in the Above Average range was reduced to 43%. Conclusions From baseline to the six- or eight-week assessment, participants reported lower emotional support, friendship, and no change in perceived rejection. Ad perceptions of instrumental support increased and perceived hostility lowered. However, due to the small sample size it is unlikely that a statistically significant trend could be detected at this time. These descriptive statistics demonstrate preliminary changes related to a brief dose of treatment for late life hoarding disorder. As treatment for geriatric hoarding disorder typically requires longer trea -Abstract Truncated-
psychiatry,geriatrics & gerontology,gerontology