Abstract:Brain–computer interfaces (BCI) use neuroelectric and metabolic brain activity to activate peripheral devices and computers without mediation of the motor system. In order to activate the BCI patients have to learn a certain amount of brain control. Self-regulation of brain activity was found to follow the principles of skill learning and instrumental conditioning. This review focuses on the clinical application of brain–computer interfaces in paralyzed patients with locked-in syndrome and completely locked-in syndrome (CLIS). It was shown that electroencephalogram (EEG)-based brain–computer interfaces allow selection of letters and words in a computer menu with different types of EEG signals. However, in patients with CLIS without any muscular control, particularly of eye movements, classical EEG-based brain–computer interfaces were not successful. Even after implantation of electrodes in the human brain, CLIS patients were unable to communicate. We developed a theoretical model explaining this fundamental deficit in instrumental learning of brain control and voluntary communication: patients in complete paralysis extinguish goal-directed response-oriented thinking and intentions. Therefore, a reflexive classical conditioning procedure was developed and metabolic brain signals measured with near infrared spectroscopy were used in CLIS patients to answer simple questions with a “yes” or “no”-brain response. The data collected so far are promising and show that for the first time CLIS patients communicate with such a BCI system using metabolic brain signals and simple reflexive learning tasks. Finally, brain machine interfaces and rehabilitation in chronic stroke are described demonstrating in chronic stroke patients without any residual upper limb movement a surprising recovery of motor function on the motor level as well as on the brain level. After extensive combined BCI training with behaviorally oriented physiotherapy, significant improvement in motor function was shown in this previously intractable paralysis. In conclusion, clinical application of brain machine interfaces in well-defined and circumscribed neurological disorders have demonstrated surprisingly positive effects. The application of BCIs to psychiatric and clinical–psychological problems, however, at present did not result in substantial improvement of complex behavioral disorders.

The challenge of controlling an auditory BCI in the case of severe motor disability

Is controlling a brain-computer interface just a matter of presence of mind? The limits of cognitive-motor dissociation

Performance of Brain–Computer Interfacing Based on Tactile Selective Sensation and Motor Imagery

Direct Brain Control and Communication in Paralysis

Brain-Computer Interface: Applications to Speech Decoding and Synthesis to Augment Communication

Learning from brain control: clinical application of brain–computer interfaces

An independent SSVEP-based brain-computer interface in locked-in syndrome

Why BCIs work poorly with the patients who need them the most?

Stable Decoding from a Speech BCI Enables Control for an Individual with ALS without Recalibration for 3 Months

Fully Implanted Brain-Computer Interface in a Locked-In Patient with ALS

Real-time Decoding Algorithm in Brain Machine Interfaces

Researching brain-computer interfaces for enhancing communication and control in neurological disorders

Brain–computer interfaces for communication and rehabilitation

Spelling interface using intracortical signals in a completely locked-in patient enabled via auditory neurofeedback training

EEG-based brain-computer interface methods with the aim of rehabilitating advanced stage ALS patients

Reaching and Grasping a Glass of Water by Locked-In ALS Patients through a BCI-Controlled Humanoid Robot

Brain Function, Learning, and Role of Feedback in Complete Paralysis

The feasibility of combining communication BCIs with FES for individuals with locked-in syndrome

Brain-Computer interface control of stepping from invasive electrocorticography upper-limb motor imagery in a patient with quadriplegia

Online speech synthesis using a chronically implanted brain–computer interface in an individual with ALS

Neural mechanisms of brain–computer interface control