Abstract:OBJECTIVE:To develop and evaluate scaling and scoring assumptions, and the reliability and the validity of a Chinese version of the SF-36 scales.METHODS:A multi-stage mixed sampling procedure was used to select a representative sample of the general population. The sample size was 1 000 households. All family members of a selected household, aged 18 and older, completed a survey by self-administration. Formal psychometric methods for testing assumptions underlying item scoring and scale construction were used according to the standard procedure of the IQOLA Project.RESULTS:Of the 1 985 collected questionnaires, 1 972 were qualified. Of them, 1 688 (85.6%) were respondents. 1 316 respondents answered all 36 items, while the remaining (372 respondents) answered with one or several missing responses. Among the non-respondents, 65.5% were illiteracy or quasi-illiteracy. The assumption of equal intervals was violated for the VT and MH scales. The recoded item values were used to calculate scale scores. The clustering and ordering of the item means were approximately the same as that of the source version and other two Chinese versions. The items in each scale had similar standard deviations except those in the PF, BP, SF scales. The correlations between an item and its hypothesized scale were identical for all except the SF and VT scales. The scaling success rates of convergent validity were 0% for the SF scale, 75% for the VT scale, and 100% for the other six scales. The scaling success rates of discriminat validity ranged from 87.5% to 100% for all scales except for the SF scale. The Cronbach' alpha coefficients of internal consistency reliability ranged from 0.72 to 0.88, which were satisfactory for group comparison except 0.39 for the SF scale and 0.66 for the VT scale. The two-weeks test-retest reliability coefficient ranged from 0.66 to 0.94. Factor analysis identified two principal components: a "physical" factor and a "mental" factor. Taken together, these two factors could be used to explain 56.3% of the total variance.CONCLUSION:The Chinese version of the SF-36 Health Survey Scale has achieved conceptual equivalence and satisfied the psychometric scaling assumptions well enough to warrant wide use in China. Known-groups validity will give more meaningful evidences of the validity of the Chinese SF-36 scales.

The validity of the Wong and Law Emotional Intelligence Scale in a Chinese sample: Tests of measurement invariance and latent mean differences across gender and age

Psychometric Properties and Measurement Invariance Across Sex of the Wong and Law Emotional Intelligence Scale in Chinese adolescents

Validation of Emotional Intelligence Scale in Chinese University Students

The Measurement Invariance of the Wong and Law Emotional Intelligence Scale (WLEIS) Across Three Chinese University Student Groups From Canada and China

Validation of the Emotional Intelligence Scale

A bifactor model of the Wong and Law Emotional Intelligence Scale and its association with subjective well-being

Chinese Version of the Responses to Positive Affect Questionnaire: Testing the Factor Structure, Reliability, and Validity in A College Student Sample

TRANSLATION AND PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES OF WONG AND LAW EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE SCALE FOR ADOLESCENTS

Emotional Intelligence: Construct Validity and Instrumentality

The Chinese Version of the EPOCH Measure of Adolescent Well-Being: Testing Cross-Cultural Measurement Invariance

Reliability and Vaiidatioa of the Social Comparison Orientation Scale

Investigating the validity of the Wong and Law Emotional Intelligence Scale in a Nepali student sample

Validation of the Peruvian version of the Wong and Law Emotional Intelligence Scale (WLEIS-P)

WLEIS as a Measure of Emotional Intelligence of Healthcare Professionals: A Confirmatory Factor Analysis

Development and validation of the Emotional Intelligence Test for Adolescents in a Chinese sample.

Consumer Susceptibility to Interpersonal Influence in Mainland China

Development and Psychometric Tests of a Chinese Version of the SF-36 Health Survey Scales.

Individual and group emotional intelligence measurement of sex differences and invariance for individual (WLEIS-S) and group (WEIP-S) emotional intelligence measurement scales

Emotion Regulation Questionnaire for Cross-Gender Measurement Invariance in Chinese University Students

Factorial Invariance of the Questionnaire about Interpersonal Difficulties for Adolescents Across Spanish and Chinese Adolescent Samples

Validation and measurement invariance of the Chinese version of the academic self-efficacy scale for university students