Leading Against Gender Stereotypes: the Positively Deviant Effect of Leader Epistemic Motivation
Jack Ting-Ju Chiang,Haiyang Liu,Ye Zhang,Shengming Liu,Siting Wang,Jih-Yu Mao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2016.15491abstract
2016-01-01
Abstract:This paper proposes that Kelley's attribution principles (Kelley, 1972a, 1972b), rather than role congruity theory (Eagly & Karau, 2002), should be adopted to examine the positively deviant effect of leader role and gender role comparison. In fact, while leader epistemic motivation is not related to team activated fault lines, this study found that a leader's gender does moderate the relationship between leader epistemic motivation and team activated faultlines. Using a sample of 113 team leaders and 526 team members across 24 real estate firms in China, researchers analyzed the moderating role of leader gender among leader epistemic motivation, team activated faultlines, and team performance at the team-level. The gender moderating effect discovered in this paper supports previous research and also charges into a new direction. On one hand, the findings are consistent with the predictions of Kelley's attribution principles that female leaders' epistemic motivation has a stronger, negative effect on their team activated faultlines than their male counterparts. However, this paper also finds that the negative, indirect effects of leader epistemic motivation on team performance through team activated faultlines were stronger for female leaders than for male leaders. All in all, this paper has important implications for gender- related studies as well as leadership theory.