University Staff Insights on Interprofessional Education and Student-Led Clinic Opportunities at an Australian University
Julie Collis,Sarah Barradell,Patrick Broman,Sharon Brownie
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/jmdh.s447690
2024-01-21
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
Abstract:Julie M Collis, 1 Sarah Barradell, 1 Patrick Broman, 1, 2 Sharon Brownie 1– 3 1 School of Health Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; 2 Centre for Health and Social Practice, Waikato Institute of Technology, Hamilton, New Zealand; 3 Griffith Health, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia Correspondence: Julie M Collis, Email Purpose: Organizational and university staff buy-in and advocacy are critical considerations in planning successful interprofessional education (IPE) initiatives in healthcare, such as interprofessional student-led clinics (SLCs). This study was designed with the purpose of gaining deeper insight into current views and perspectives of academic and professional staff at an Australian university, as a precursor to planning IPE and SLC activities. Methods: All academic and professional staff from within the School of Health Sciences were invited to participate in the study. In-depth-qualitative interviews were conducted with 16 staff to explore academic and professional staff perspectives on IPE and SLCs. Reflexive thematic analysis was used to analyse the data. Results: Findings are grouped within five themes that incorporate broad perspectives on the tensions and possibilities of IPE and establishment of SLCs: Academic and professional staff commitment; Better/smarter IPE; Student-led clinic potential; Vision and innovation; and Strategy and resourcing. The themes reflect the high value placed on IPE by academic and professional staff and incorporate innovative ideas on how to prepare students for a rapidly changing and evolving healthcare environment. A reticence towards standard models of university based SLCs was expressed. Conclusion: Academic and professional staff insights suggest university leaders need to develop a greater strategic focus on improving IPE. Effective engagement with staff is required to support IPE planning and implementation. If considering implementation of SLCs, contemporary fit-for-purpose models should be explored such as partnerships with primary healthcare providers, community wellness facilities, and hospital clinics rather than traditional university-based clinics. Keywords: health occupations, interprofessional education, interdisciplinary placement, patient care team Education of health professionals is constantly adapting within universities to ensure that graduates are ready to practice in increasingly complex health environments. 1 Current industry requirements suggest that health graduates must be ready to address complex comorbid conditions, and the burgeoning needs associated with an aging population. Interprofessional education (IPE) and practice (IPP) opportunities are globally acknowledged as an effective mechanism by which to develop the interprofessional competencies needed to address the previously mentioned challenges of contemporary health service delivery. 1,2 The World Health Organisation defines IPE as occurring when students from different disciplines engage in collaborative learning and problem solving to improve health outcomes. 3 One IPE strategy that has strong uptake amongst universities is the establishment of university-based student led clinics (SLCs). SLCs have been widely implemented for the purposes of providing interprofessional learning, increasing numbers of fieldwork placements, and providing healthcare to the local community and/or underserved populations. 4 Although IPE and SLCs are widely reported around the world, hindrances to successful implementation of these strategies remain at the forefront of educational literature 5,6 Current best-practice for IPE and SLCs, and the degree to which academic staff support establishing university-based SLCs remain unclear in the literature. Despite the longstanding recognition of the need for graduate health professionals to engage in IPE and attain interprofessional competence, progress remains frustratingly slow. For any university initiative to be successful it is essential that proposed changes be informed by current evidence, 'what works', and faculty views and perspectives. It is well documented that without the support and buy-in of staff and appropriate resourcing from university administration, IPE or SLC innovations are unlikely to be successful. 7–9 We therefore set out to canvas academic and professional staff perspectives to inform cohesive, staff-supported directions at Swinburne University of Technology. The aim of this study was to explore academic and professional staff perspectives on interprofessional education and SLC opportunities. The intent was to assess the level of faculty and staff und -Abstract Truncated-
health care sciences & services