Private roles for public goals in China’s social services
John D Donahue,Karen Eggleston,Yijia Jing,Richard J Zeckhauser
2013-01-01
Abstract:China, like other countries, has public needs that far outstrip the abil-ities of the government alone to deliver, including the broad array of social services that support healthy aging. In this chapter, drawing on a survey of 17 medium-sized cities, we discuss how China’s local governments are seeking ways to create public value through contracting with the private sector and collaborative arrangements with some shared discretion, what we label “collaborative governance”(Donahue and Zeckhauser 2011; Donahue, Eggleston, and Zeckhauser 2018). 1 China’s determination to rapidly replicate—even leapfrog—the social service networks constructed over decades or centuries in the West poses a historic challenge of capacity-building. Audacious plans for “equalization of access” to eight major service areas—education, employment services, social insurance (pensions, maternity and unemployment insurance, etc.), social support services, healthcare and public health, family planning, housing security, and cultural, sports, and recreational activities—were announced in mid-2012 by the central government. The 12th (2011–15) and 13th (2016–20) five-year plans call for an expanded role for competition and outsourcing in basic public services ranging from health and education to1 Collaborative governance is defined as government sharing with the private sector a real measure of discretion as to the means and, to some extent, the ends of collective action (see Donahue, Eggleston, and Zeckhauser 2018). The private sector includes both for-profit and non-profit entities.