Abstract:Can location-based mobile promotion (LMP) trigger contemporaneous and delayed sales purchases? As mobile technologies can reach users anywhere and anytime, LMP becomes a promising new channel. We unravel the dynamic sales impact of LMP on the basis of a randomized field experiment with 22,000 mobile users sponsored by one of the largest mobile service providers in the world. Our identification strategy is to gauge the marginal increases in consumer purchases of the geo-fenced treatment group of users who received LMP, above and beyond the baseline control groups. There are two controls: one group who received the same LMP but not in the virtual geo-fencing locational range (nongeo-fenced control), and the other who did not receive the LMP but in the geo-fencing range (geo-fenced control). The latter control serves as an organic holdout baseline from the similar population, i.e., counterfactual test of what if without the mobile LMP intervention, to identify the actual “lift” of incremental purchases caused by the treatment with the mobile LMP intervention. Findings suggest that LMP treatment has a significantly stronger impact on contemporaneous (same-day) purchases and delayed (subsequent-days) purchases than the controls. The randomized experiment design renders these findings robust to alternative explanations such as mobile usage behavior heterogeneity, product effects heterogeneity, nonrandomized sample-selection bias, and endogeneity concerns. Follow-up surveys with the field experiment users explore the nuanced mechanisms via which LMP may induce the impulsive, same-day purchases, and create product awareness for the planned subsequent-days purchases. LMP can generate six times more purchases than nongeo-fenced control with the LMP intervention, and 12 times more than geo-fenced control without the LMP intervention. LMP has a delayed sales effect for 12 days after the mobile promotions. The total sales impact of LMP could be underestimated by 54% if excluding the delayed sales impact and only including the contemporaneous impact. These findings are new to the literature and often neglected in mobile promotion practices, proffering novel implications on the sales value of LMP in the mobile era.

Sunny, Rainy, and Cloudy with A Chance of Mobile Promotion Effectiveness

Weather and Mobile Purchases: 10-Million-user Field Study

In search of time to bring the message on social media: Effects of temporal targeting and weather on digital consumers

Contemporaneous and Delayed Sales Impact of Location-Based Mobile Promotions

Promoting Water Conservation Based on the Matching Effect of Regulatory Focus and Emotion

Modeling User Engagement in Mobile Content Consumption with Tapstream Data and Field Experiment

Targeted Promotions and Cross-Category Spillover Effects

Personalized Mobile Targeting with User Engagement Stages: Combining a Structural Hidden Markov Model and Field Experiment

Reviving Order Online: the Effect of Purchase Feature in Social Media Mobile Apps

Push and pull: Modeling mobile app promotions and consumer responses

Predicting Consumer Variety-Seeking Through Weather Data Analytics.

Targeted Promotions on an E-Book Platform: Crowding Out, Heterogeneity, and Opportunity Costs

Weather and time factors impact on online food delivery sales: a comparative analysis of three Chinese cities

A Clustering-Based Sales Forecast Method For Big Promotion Days In O2o On-Demand Retailing

Personalized Promotion Decision Making Based on Direct and Enduring Effect Predictions

THE EFFECT OF FIRM MARKETING CONTENT ON PRODUCT SALES: EVIDENCE FROM A MOBILE SOCIAL MEDIA PLATFORM

Impact of different platform promotions on online sales and conversion rate: The role of business model and product line length

Forward-Looking Behavior in Mobile Data Consumption and Targeted Promotion Design: A Dynamic Structural Model

Promotional Games Increase Consumer Conversion Rates and Spending

Capturing Conversion Rate Fluctuation during Sales Promotions: A Novel Historical Data Reuse Approach

Estimating Promotion Effects Using Big Data: A Partially Profiled LASSO Model with Endogeneity Correction