Abstract:Three Bayesian related approaches, namely, variational Bayesian (VB), minimum message length (MML) and Bayesian Ying-Yang (BYY) harmony learning, have been applied to automatically determining an appropriate number of components during learning Gaussian mixture model (GMM). This paper aims to provide a comparative investigation on these approaches with not only a Jeffreys prior but also a conjugate Dirichlet-Normal-Wishart (DNW) prior on GMM. In addition to adopting the existing algorithms either directly or with some modifications, the algorithm for VB with Jeffreys prior and the algorithm for BYY with DNW prior are developed in this paper to fill the missing gap. The performances of automatic model selection are evaluated through extensive experiments, with several empirical findings: 1) Considering priors merely on the mixing weights, each of three approaches makes biased mistakes, while considering priors on all the parameters of GMM makes each approach reduce its bias and also improve its performance. 2) As Jeffreys prior is replaced by the DNW prior, all the three approaches improve their performances. Moreover, Jeffreys prior makes MML slightly better than VB, while the DNW prior makes VB better than MML. 3) As the hyperparameters of DNW prior are further optimized by each of its own learning principle, BYY improves its performances while VB and MML deteriorate their performances when there are too many free hyper-parameters. Actually, VB and MML lack a good guide for optimizing the hyper-parameters of DNW prior. 4) BYY considerably outperforms both VB and MML for any type of priors and whether hyper-parameters are optimized. Being different from VB and MML that rely on appropriate priors to perform model selection, BYY does not highly depend on the type of priors. It has model selection ability even without priors and performs already very well with Jeffreys prior, and incrementally improves as Jeffreys prior is replaced by the DNW prior. Finally, all algorithms are applied on the Berkeley segmentation database of real world images. Again, BYY considerably outperforms both VB and MML, especially in detecting the objects of interest from a confusing background.

A Comparative Study on Lagrange Ying-Yang Alternation Method in Gaussian Mixture-Based Clustering

Projection-embedded BYY Learning Algorithm for Gaussian Mixture-Based Clustering

Learning Gaussian Mixture with Automatic Model Selection: A Comparative Study on Three Bayesian Related Approaches

A BYY Scale-Incremental EM Algorithm for Gaussian Mixture Learning

The BYY annealing learning algorithm for Gaussian mixture with automated model selection

The Competitive EM Algorithm for Gaussian Mixtures with BYY Harmony Criterion

EGMM: an Evidential Version of the Gaussian Mixture Model for Clustering

Learning local factor analysis versus mixture of factor analyzers with automatic model selection

Bayesian Ying-Yang Machine, Clustering And Number Of Clusters

Image Segmentation with the EM and the BYY Learning

Gaussian Mixture Learning Via Robust Competitive Agglomeration

A Greedy Merge Learning Algorithm for Gaussian Mixture Model

New Advances on Bayesian Ying-Yang Learning System with Kullback and Non-Kullback Separation Functionals

Generalized Competitive Learning of Gaussian Mixture Models

Manifold Regularized Gaussian Mixture Model for Semi-supervised Clustering.

A Fast Fixed-Point Byy Harmony Learning Algorithm on Gaussian Mixture with Automated Model Selection

A New Feature Selection Method for Gaussian Mixture Clustering

A Spatial Gaussian Mixture Model for Optical Remote Sensing Image Clustering.

Unsupervised Learning of Gaussian Mixture Model with Application to Image Segmentation

An Unsupervised Gaussian Mixture Classification Mechanism Based on Statistical Learning Analysis

Learning GMM Using Elliptically Contoured Distributions