Abstract:Vulnerabilities publicly disclosed in the National Vulnerability Database (NVD) are assigned with CVE (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures) IDs and associated with specific software versions. Many organizations, including IT companies and government, heavily rely on the disclosed vulnerabilities in NVD to mitigate their security risks. Once a software is claimed as vulnerable by NVD, these organizations would examine the presence of the vulnerable versions of the software and assess the impact on themselves. However, the version information about vulnerable software in NVD is not always reliable. Nguyen et al. find that the version information of many CVE vulnerabilities is spurious and propose an approach based on the original SZZ algorithm (i.e., an approach to identify bug-introducing commits) to assess the software versions affected by CVE vulnerabilities. However, SZZ algorithms are designed for common bugs, while vulnerabilities and bugs are different. Many bugs are introduced by a recent bug-fixing commit, but vulnerabilities are usually introduced in their initial versions. Thus, the current SZZ algorithms often fail to identify the inducing commits for vulnerabilities. Therefore, in this study, we propose an approach based on an improved SZZ algorithm to refine software versions affected by CVE vulnerabilities. Our proposed SZZ algorithm leverages the line mapping algorithms to identify the earliest commit that modified the vulnerable lines, and then considers these commits to be the vulnerability-inducing commits, as opposed to the previous SZZ algorithms that assume the commits that last modified the buggy lines as the inducing commits. To evaluate our proposed approach, we manually annotate the true inducing commits and verify the vulnerable versions for 172 CVE vulnerabilities with fixing commits from two publicly available datasets with five C/C++ and 41 Java projects, respectively. We find that 99 out of 172 vulnerabilities whose version information is spurious. The experiment results show that our proposed approach can identify more vulnerabilities with the true inducing commits and correct vulnerable versions than the previous SZZ algorithms. Our approach outperforms the previous SZZ algorithms in terms of F1-score for identifying vulnerability-inducing commits on both C/C++ and Java projects (0.736 and 0.630, respectively). For refining vulnerable versions, our approach also achieves the best performance on the two datasets in terms of F1-score (0.928 and 0.952).

A Conditional Probability Computation Method for Vulnerability Exploitation Based on CVSS

Vulnerability Analysis of CSP Based on Stochastic Game Theory

V-SZZ: Automatic Identification of Version Ranges Affected by CVE Vulnerabilities

Computer Network System Security Assessment Method.

RISK-BASED VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT IN COMPLEX POWER SYSTEMS

A Probability-Based Approach to Attack Graphs Generation

Assessing network vulnerability under probabilistic region failure model

Risk Based Vulnerability Assessment for Hvdc Transmission System

Assessment method of automatic optimizing CVSS v20 vulnerability indi-cator s

Automotive Cybersecurity Vulnerability Assessment Using the Common Vulnerability Scoring System and Bayesian Network Model

Gotta Catch 'em All: Aggregating CVSS Scores

A Mining Method for Computer Vulnerability Correlation

A Survey on Software Vulnerability Exploitability Assessment

Quantitative Security Risk Evaluation using CVSS Metrics by Estimation of Frequency and Maturity of Exploit

Support for the Vulnerability Management Process Using Conversion CVSS Base Score 2.0 to 3.x

Research on the distribution of CVSS environmental scores

A Historical and Statistical Studyof the Software Vulnerability Landscape

Categorizing and Predicting Invalid Vulnerabilities on Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures

Vulnerability Assessment of a Multistate Component for IEMI Based on a Bayesian Method

Vulnerability Correlation, Multi-step Attack and Exploit Chain in Breach and Attack Simulation

A Bayesian Estimation of Confidence Limits for Multi-state System Vulnerability Assessment with IEMI