Modified Balloon Aortic Valvuloplasty in Fragile Symptomatic Patients Unsuitable for Both Surgical and Percutaneous Valve Replacement.

Gianluca Rigatelli,Fabio Dell'Avvocata,Luca Conte,Daniela Lanza,Sara Giatti,Pierluigi Del Santo,Loris Roncon,Giuseppe Faggian
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carrev.2017.10.008
2018-01-01
Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine
Abstract:Background: Balloon Aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) is considered as a bridge therapy to percutaneous valve implantation or a palliative treatment in patients with aortic valve stenosis (AVS). Potential risk of complications, in particular in fragile patients, is still not negligible. Aim: To describe the technique and outcomes of modified BAV in fragile symptomatic patients unsuitable for other treatments using no-pacing and minimally invasive approach. Methods: Symptomatic fragile patients with severe aortic valve stenosis judged unsuitable by the heart team for surgical or percutaneous valve implantation from 1 September 2013 to 1 September 2017 were offered modified BAV. Simplified procedural protocol included a 4F right radial artery access for gradient check, a 8F compatible undersized balloons, two partial inflations-trial before a full inflation with no-pace maker back-up, final pressure gradient recording and aortography. Results: Thirty-four symptomatic fragile patients (mean age 80.9 +/- 4.9, range 73 to 91 years, 100% Katz >6, mean Euroscore I 30.0 +/- 11.7%) underwent modified BAV in the last 5 years with immediate success in all (100%). Mean aortic valve area increased from 0.58 +/- 0.2 cm(2) to 1.1 +/- 0.2 cm(2) (p < 0.01) whereas mean peak gradient decreased from 75.6 +/- 11.3 to 35.8 +/- 11.2 mm Hg (p < 0.01). Procedural complications were 14.7%. Thirty-day mortality was 11.8%. On a mean follow up of 38.4 +/- 4.6 months four patients successfully repeated the procedure, while global mortality was 23.5% (8 patients). The other 22 patients maintained a NYHA class of 2.1 +/- 0.7. Conclusions: No-pacing minimally invasive BAV seems to have acceptable outcomes in patients with severe AVS and no other treatment options. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?