Difficult Groin Reconstruction Using Contralateral Rectus Abdominis Myocutaneous Flap
Fazhi Qi,Jiande Gu,Yuedong Shi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000300213.72718.b1
2008-01-01
Abstract:Sir: Management of a nonhealing femoral wound after vascular surgery or severe irradiation is a challenging problem. A variety of myocutaneous flaps, such as the tensor fasciae latae, rectus abdominis, gracilis, sartorius, and gluteus maximus, have been used in the treatment of femoral wounds.1–4 However, all of the flaps reported have been ipsilateral to the affected side. Recently, we used contralateral rectus abdominis myocutaneous flaps to cover a femoral wound in two cases when ipsilateral flaps were not possible. To our knowledge, there is still no report of this in the English or Chinese literature. In case 1, the patient had received an expanded polytetrafluoroethylene femoral arterial vascular graft 2 years earlier. The prosthetic vascular graft had acute thrombosis. He underwent emergency surgery to remove the embolus through the right-side femoral artery. However, the prosthesis became infected and exposed to the femoral ulcer. Staphylococcus epidermidis was positive in organism culture. In consideration of the femoral vascular graft thrombosis, a contralateral rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap was selected. The flap was created and transferred to the wound and survived completely. The patient was followed up at 3 months and 2 years postoperatively. The limb was preserved. Case 2 involved a 43-year-old man with a chronic right femoral wound and lymphedema of the right leg after groin dissection and irradiation therapy. The primary diagnosis was sarcoma. The wound had been present for 4 years. The 6 × 13-cm ulcer was surrounded by severe scar contracture. There was severe lymphedema of the right leg. Based on the scar, the ipsilateral inferior epigastric vessels may have been involved. A rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap on the same side was abandoned. Due to the lymphedema of the leg, the tensor fasciae latae, gracilis, and sartorius muscles were immersed in the edematous fluid; therefore, a contralateral rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap was chosen. The flap took completely. The lymphedema was significantly reduced. The patient was seen for a follow-up visit at 3 months and was interviewed by telephone 3 years postoperatively. He was quite satisfied with the outcome. It is believed that successful muscle transfer can improve healing time, lower bacterial counts, and improve antibiotic delivery. The vascularized muscle increases local oxygen tension and enhances the ability of macrophages to combat infection. The muscle flap also provides tissue bulk to obliterate dead space and diminishes the risk of recurrent infection.1 The successfully transferred myocutaneous flap can also improve lymph circulation and can benefit obstructive lymphedema. Our result confirms this. The lymphedema was significantly reduced. It is of paramount importance to ensure that pedicle vessels are not obstructed when flaps are used. Morasch et al.1 suggested intraoperative assessment of patency with a handheld Doppler scanning probe. There is also value in harvesting a muscle from a site that is far away from the wound. When there is doubt about the donor vessel patency of the ipsilateral side, the flap from the healthy contralateral side should be considered. Our experience with these two cases of repair provides the evidence that the contralateral rectus abdominis flap is a valuable technique in some difficult conditions. Fazhi Qi, M.D., Ph.D. Jianying Gu, M.D. Yuedong Shi, M.D. Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Zhongshan Hospital Fudan University Shanghai, P. R. China