Impact of Metabolic Syndrome on Early Postoperative Outcomes After Cervical Disk Replacement
Eric Zhao,Daniel J Shinn,Mark Basilious,Tejas Subramanian,Pratyush Shahi,Troy B Amen,Omri Maayan,Sidhant Dalal,Kasra Araghi,Junho Song,Evan D Sheha,James E Dowdell,Sravisht Iyer,Sheeraz A Qureshi,Daniel J. Shinn,Troy B. Amen,Evan D. Sheha,James E. Dowdell,Sheeraz A. Qureshi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/bsd.0000000000001567
2024-02-05
Abstract:Study Design: Retrospective cohort study. Objective: To compare the demographics, perioperative variables, and complication rates following cervical disk replacement (CDR) among patients with and without metabolic syndrome (MetS). Summary of Background Data: The prevalence of MetS—involving concurrent obesity, insulin resistance, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia—has increased in the United States over the last 2 decades. Little is known about the impact of MetS on early postoperative outcomes and complications following CDR. Methods: The 2005–2020 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program was queried for patients who underwent primary 1- or 2-level CDR. Patients with and without MetS were divided into 2 cohorts. MetS was defined, according to other National Surgical Quality Improvement Program studies, as concurrent diabetes mellitus, hypertension requiring medication, and body mass index ≥30 kg/m 2 . Rates of 30-day readmission, reoperation, complications, length of hospital stay, and discharge disposition were compared using χ 2 and Fisher exact tests. One to 2 propensity-matching was performed, matching for demographics, comorbidities, and number of operative levels. Results: A total of 5395 patients were included for unmatched analysis. Two hundred thirty-six had MetS, and 5159 did not. The MetS cohort had greater rates of 30-day readmission (2.5% vs. 0.9%; P =0.023), morbidity (2.5% vs. 0.9%; P =0.032), nonhome discharges (3% vs. 0.6%; P =0.002), and longer hospital stays (1.35±4.04 vs. 1±1.48 days; P =0.029). After propensity-matching, 699 patients were included. All differences reported above lost significance ( P >0.05) except for 30-day morbidity (superficial wound infections), which remained higher for the MetS cohort (2.5% vs. 0.4%, P =0.02). Conclusions: We identified MetS as an independent predictor of 30-day morbidity in the form of superficial wound infections following single-level CDR. Although MetS patients experienced greater rates of 30-day readmission, nonhome discharge, and longer lengths of stay, MetS did not independently predict these outcomes after controlling for baseline differences in patient characteristics. Level of Evidence: Level III.
clinical neurology,orthopedics