The prognostic value of AGR2 expression in solid tumours: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Shao-bo Tian,Kai-xiong Tao,Jia Hu,Zhi-bo Liu,Xue-liang Ding,Ya-nan Chu,Jin-yuan Cui,Xiao-ming Shuai,Jin-bo Gao,Kai-lin Cai,Ji-liang Wang,Guo-bin Wang,Lin Wang,Zheng Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-15757-z
IF: 4.6
2017-01-01
Scientific Reports
Abstract:The prognostic value of anterior gradient-2 (AGR2) in tumours remains inconclusive. Here, we systematically reviewed the literature evidence and assessed the association between AGR2 expression and prognosis in solid tumours. The primary outcomes were overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS), and disease-free survival (DFS)/recurrence-free survival (RFS)/progression-free survival (PFS). All analyses were performed by STATA 12.0, with the hazard ratio (HR) or odds ratios (OR), and 95% confidence interval (CI) as the effect size estimate. A total of 20 studies containing 3285 cases were included. Pooled analyses revealed that AGR2 overexpression had an unfavourable impact on OS (HR 1.93, 95% CI 1.32–2.81) and time to tumour progression (TTP) (DFS/RFS/PFS) (HR 1.60 95% CI 1.06–2.40) in solid tumour patients. Subgroup analyses indicated that AGR2 overexpression in breast cancer patients was significantly associated with poor OS (HR 3.02, 95% CI 1.03–8.81) and TTP (HR 1.93, 95% CI 1.17–3.20). Excluding breast cancer, AGR2 overexpression was also found to have a significant correlation with poor OS in the remaining solid tumour patients (HR 1.51, 95% CI 1.04–2.19). Overall, AGR2 might be a potential biomarker to predict prognosis in solid tumour patients.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?