Abstract:Background Cardiovascular health (CVH) is closely associated with depression. However, Life's Essential 8 (LE8), a novel CVH measure, has not yet been clearly linked to depression. This study aims to explore the association between LE8 and depression, compare its advantages over Life's Simple 7 (LS7), and investigate the mediating effects of oxidative stress and inflammation. Methods This study investigated cross-sectional data of adults aged 20 and above from National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2005 to 2018. The LE8 score (ranging from 0 to 100) was derived from the American Heart Association's definition, based on the unweighted average of 8 metrics, classified as low cardiovascular health (CVH) (0–49), moderate CVH (50–79), and high CVH (80–100). Similar to LE8, LS7 scores were categorized into inadequate (0–7), average (8–10), or optimal (11–14) after calculating the unweighted mean of each component. Depression was diagnosed using the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), with a score of ≥10 defining depression. Adjusted for sociodemographic factors and other risk factors for depression, weighted logistic regression and restricted cubic spline analysis were used to explore the correlation. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to study the associations between CVH scores and depression. Subsequently, subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis were conducted, followed by an exploration of the mechanisms involved. Results A total of 7 cycles from 2005 to 2018 contained complete data. Weighted logistic regression showed that both LS7 and LE8 were significantly associated with depression. Specifically, for LE8, after adjustment, the risk of depression decreased by 52 % for moderate CVH compared to low CVH (OR: 0.48, 95 % CI: 0.41–0.57, P < 0.0001), while the risk decreased by 80 % for high CVH (OR: 0.20, 95 % CI: 0.15–0.26, P < 0.0001, P trend < 0.0001). For LS7, after adjustment, compared with inadequate CVH, the risk of depression decreased by 49 % for average CVH (OR: 0.51, 95 % CI: 0.34–0.78, P = 0.002), and by 55 % for optimal CVH (OR: 0.45, 95 % CI: 0.27–0.74, P = 0.002, P trend < 0.0001). Area under ROC curves for predicting depression were 0.672 (95 % CI, 0.66–0.684; P < 0.001) and 0.605 (95 % CI, 0.59–0.619; P < 0.001) for LE8 and LS7 (P DeLong < 0.001), respectively. Sensitivity analysis demonstrated the robustness of the association. GGT and WBC jointly mediated 9.62 % of this association (all P < 0.001). Limitations The cross-sectional study cannot infer causality. Conclusions The association between Life's Essential 8 and depression was stronger and more practical. Oxidative stress and inflammation mediate this association. Individuals with extremely poor cardiovascular health have a 7-fold increased risk of depression, highlighting the necessity of maintaining at least moderate cardiovascular health.

Associations between life's essential 8 and metabolic health among us adults: insights of NHANES from 2005 to 2018

Life Essentials 8 score and risk of metabolic syndrome: A dose-response analysis in the US population

Association of cardiovascular health using Life's Essential 8 with noncommunicable disease multimorbidity

Association Between New Life’s Essential 8 and the Risk of All-Cause and Cardiovascular Mortality in Patients with Hypertension: a Cohort Study

Association between new Life's Essential 8 and the risk of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in patients with hypertension: a cohort study

Using the New “life’s Essential 8” Metrics to Evaluate Trends in Cardiovascular Health among US Adults from 2005 to 2018: Analysis of Serial Cross-sectional Studies

Association between cardiovascular health assessed by life's essential 8 and hyperuricemia in U.S. adults: the NHANES 2009-2020

Association between the AHA life's essential 8 and prediabetes/diabetes: a cross-sectional NHANES study

Comparison of the associations between Life's Essential 8 and Life's Simple 7 with depression, as well as the mediating role of oxidative stress factors and inflammation: NHANES 2005–2018

The impact of cardiovascular health on mortality in US adults with cardiometabolic disease: A prospective nationwide cohort study

Association between the American Heart Association's New Life's Essential 8 Metrics and Depression Symptom in U.S General Adults, Finding from NHANES 2005-2018

Association of cardiovascular health using Life's Essential 8 with depression: Findings from NHANES 2007–2018

Association of lifes essential 8 and mortality among adults with and without CVD

Association between Life's Essential 8 and cognitive function among older adults in the United States

Associations between Life’s Essential 8 and cancer among US adults

Association of the American Heart Association’s new “Life’s Essential 8” with all-cause and cardiovascular disease-specific mortality: prospective cohort study

Associations of life's essential 8 with MAFLD and liver fibrosis among US adults: a nationwide cross-section study

Association of life's essential 8 with mortality among the individuals with cardiovascular disease

Life's essential 8 and cardiovascular diseases progression among adults in the United Kingdom

Baseline and longitudinal cardiovascular health using Life's Essential 8 metrics with the risk of incident hypertension

Relationship between Life's Essential 8 and metabolic syndrome among older Americans (NHANES, 2007-2010): navigating biological aging and inflammation