Abstract:One major source of uncertainty in accurately estimating human exposure to air pollution is that human subjects move spatiotemporally, and such mobility is usually not considered in exposure estimation. How such mobility impacts exposure estimates at the population and individual level, particularly for subjects with different levels of mobility, remains under-investigated. In addition, a wide range of methods have been used in the past to develop air pollutant concentration fields for related health studies. How the choices of methods impact results of exposure estimation, especially when detailed mobility information is considered, is still largely unknown. In this study, by using a publicly available large cell phone location dataset containing over 35 million location records collected from 310,989 subjects, we investigated the impact of individual subjects' mobility on their estimated exposures for five chosen ambient pollutants (CO, NO2, SO2, O3 and PM2.5). We also estimated exposures separately for 10 groups of subjects with different levels of mobility to explore how increased mobility impacted their exposure estimates. Further, we applied and compared two methods to develop concentration fields for exposure estimation, including one based on Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model outputs, and the other based on the interpolated observed pollutant concentrations using the inverse distance weighting (IDW) method. Our results suggest that detailed mobility information does not have a significant influence on mean population exposure estimate in our sample population, although impacts can be substantial at the individual level. Additionally, exposure classification error due to the use of home-location data increased for subjects that exhibited higher levels of mobility. Omitting mobility could result in underestimation of exposures to traffic-related pollutants particularly during afternoon rush-hour, and overestimate exposures to ozone especially during mid-afternoon. Between CMAQ and IDW, we found that the IDW method generates smooth concentration fields that were not suitable for exposure estimation with detailed mobility data. Therefore, the method for developing air pollution concentration fields when detailed mobility data were to be applied should be chosen carefully. Our findings have important implications for future air pollution health studies.

Beyond Residence: A Mobility-based Approach for Improved Evaluation of Human Exposure to Environmental Hazards

Beyond Residence: A Mobility-based Approach for Improved Evaluation of Human Exposure to Environmental Hazards

Validity of Mobility-Based Exposure Assessment of Air Pollution: A Comparative Analysis with Home-Based Exposure Assessment

Modeling Real-Time Human Mobility Based on Mobile Phone and Transportation Data Fusion

Spatially Explicit Mapping of Heat Health Risk Utilizing Environmental and Socioeconomic Data

Spatial Improvement of Human Population Distribution Based on Multi-Sensor Remote-Sensing Data: an Input for Exposure Assessment

Quantifying the impact of daily mobility on errors in air pollution exposure estimation using mobile phone location data

A spatial interference approach to account for mobility in air pollution studies with multivariate continuous treatments

Assessing Mobility-Based Real-Time Air Pollution Exposure in Space and Time Using Smart Sensors and GPS Trajectories in Beijing

Mobility Behaviors Shift Disparity in Flood Exposure in U.S. Population Groups

Emergence of Urban Heat Traps from the Intersection of Human Mobility and Heat Hazard Exposure in Cities

Assessment of air pollution and air quality perception mismatch using mobility-based real-time exposure

Spatially Explicit Assessment of Heat Health Risk by Using Multi-Sensor Remote Sensing Images and Socioeconomic Data in Yangtze River Delta, China

Mobility-based environmental justice: Understanding housing disparity in real-time exposure to air pollution and momentary psychological stress in Beijing, China

Human Mobility Disproportionately Extends PM2.5 Emission Exposure for Low Income Populations

Quantifying Disparities in Air Pollution Exposures across the United States Using Home and Work Addresses

Spatially Explicit Assessment of Heat Health Risks Using Multi-source Data:A Case Study of the Yangtze River Delta Region, China

Explicit Spatializing Heat-Exposure Risk and Local Associated Factors by coupling social media data and automatic meteorological station data

Human activity and mobility data reveal disparities in exposure risk reduction indicators among socially vulnerable populations during COVID-19 for five U.S. metropolitan cities

Developing high-resolution PM2.5 exposure models by integrating low-cost sensors, automated machine learning, and big human mobility data

Who Could Not Avoid Exposure to High Levels of Residence-Based Pollution by Daily Mobility? Evidence of Air Pollution Exposure from the Perspective of the Neighborhood Effect Averaging Problem (NEAP)