Abstract:Formulating real-world optimization problems often begins with making predictions from historical data (e.g., an optimizer that aims to recommend fast routes relies upon travel-time predictions). Typically, learning the prediction model used to generate the optimization problem and solving that problem are performed in two separate stages. Recent work has showed how such prediction models can be learned end-to-end by differentiating through the optimization task. Such methods often yield empirical improvements, which are typically attributed to end-to-end making better error tradeoffs than the standard loss function used in a two-stage solution. We refine this explanation and more precisely characterize when end-to-end can improve performance. When prediction targets are stochastic, a two-stage solution must make an a priori choice about which statistics of the target distribution to model-we consider expectations over prediction targets-while an end-to-end solution can make this choice adaptively. We show that the performance gap between a two-stage and end-to-end approach is closely related to the price of correlation concept in stochastic optimization and show the implications of some existing POC results for the predict-then-optimize problem. We then consider a novel and particularly practical setting, where multiple prediction targets are combined to obtain each of the objective function's coefficients. We give explicit constructions where (1) two-stage performs unboundedly worse than end-to-end; and (2) two-stage is optimal. We use simulations to experimentally quantify performance gaps and identify a wide range of real-world applications from the literature whose objective functions rely on multiple prediction targets, suggesting that end-to-end learning could yield significant improvements.

Risk Guarantees for End-to-End Prediction and Optimization Processes

Prediction with eventual almost sure guarantees

The Perils of Learning Before Optimizing

Online Optimization With Predictions and Switching Costs: Fast Algorithms and the Fundamental Limit

Predict-Then-Optimize by Proxy: Learning Joint Models of Prediction and Optimization

End-to-End Conformal Calibration for Optimization Under Uncertainty

Data-Driven Performance Guarantees for Classical and Learned Optimizers

End-to-End Learning for Fair Multiobjective Optimization Under Uncertainty

A Generalized Portfolio Network Architecture to Improve Financial Prediction Model Leveraging Differentiable Layer

End-to-End Risk Budgeting Portfolio Optimization with Neural Networks

Fast Rates for Contextual Linear Optimization

Plug-in Performative Optimization

Decision-focused predictions via pessimistic bilevel optimization: a computational study

Stochastic Optimization Schemes for Performative Prediction with Nonconvex Loss

Smart Predict-then-Optimize Method with Dependent Data: Risk Bounds and Calibration of Autoregression

Mistake, Manipulation and Margin Guarantees in Online Strategic Classification

Risk Management and Return Prediction

A Mixture-of-Experts Prediction Framework for Evolutionary Dynamic Multiobjective Optimization

The Importance of Pessimism in Fixed-Dataset Policy Optimization

Risk management in multi-objective portfolio optimization under uncertainty